Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691122›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Safety and efficacy of TRIANGLE operation applied in pancreatic surgery: a protocol of the systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kongyuan Wei, Rosa Klotz, Eva Kalkum, Magdalena Holze, Pascal Probst, Thilo Hackert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [Advances in Surgical Treatment Following Conversion Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kongyuan Wei *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5288-642X
Rosa Klotz *Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Eva KalkumThe Study Center of the German Surgical Society (SDGC), University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magdalena HolzeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal ProbstDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0895-4015
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Thilo.Hackert@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic surgery is regarded as the only curative treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC). As the neoadjuvant therapy is applied widely nowadays, the proportion of patients with PC undergoing surgery also with locally advanced tumour findings has increased accordingly. Especially in these situations, a radical resection of all tumour tissues is challenging. A novel surgical strategy has been introduced recently to achieve this aim, namely the TRIANGLE operation which comprises the radical resection of all nerve and lymphatic tissue between coeliac artery, superior mesenteric artery and mesenteric-portal axis without including extended lymphadenectomy outside this area. Due to currently published studies, Triangle Operation is a safe and feasible procedure. However, this has not been systematically analysed to date. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate surgical and postoperative outcomes of Triangle Operation in pancreatic surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Pubmed, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials in the Cochrane Library will be searched from inception until 31 December 2022. This study will include all articles comparing Triangle Operation versus non-Triangle Operation in pancreatic surgery to assess outcomes. The primary endpoints will be R0 resection rate and 1-year overall survival. The secondary endpoints will be delayed gastric emptying, postoperative pancreatic fistula, post pancreatectomy haemorrhages and reoperation incidence, overall complications, mortality and 3-year overall survival. The study selection, study quality assessment, data extraction and critical appraisal will be carried out by two reviewers. Inter-reviewer disagreements will be evaluated by discussion with a third reviewer. Besides, a subgroup analysis will be conducted focused on robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery and open surgery in detail. Additionally, the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations framework will be performed to evaluate the strength of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis will not require ethical approval. Results will be published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42021234721.

Indexed as

Pancreatic NeoplasmsAbdomenHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicPancreasPancreatectomyPostoperative ComplicationsSystematic Reviews as TopicGastrointestinal tumoursPancreatic diseasePancreatic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36691122
PMCPMC9454055
OpenAlexW4294771591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.