Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691111›Full record

ArticleEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Major gaps in the information provided to patients before implantation of cardioverter defibrillators: a prospective patient European evaluation.

Łukasz Januszkiewicz, Sérgio Barra, Eloi Marijon, Rui Providencia, Carlo de Asmundis, Julian K R Chun, Michał M Farkowski, Giulio Conte, Serge Boveda

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyCommentRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Article in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Enhancing patient acceptance of ICD implantation through structured shared decision making: conversation is key.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2024
    Article
  3. Challenging the status quo: a scoping review of value-based care models in cardiology and electrophysiology.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Long-term cardiovascular outcomes among immigrants and non-immigrants in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a nationwide study.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Regional disparity on patient characteristics and perceptions after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation: results from an EHRA patient survey.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Łukasz Januszkiewicz1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6286-4651
Sérgio BarraCardiology Department, Hospital da Luz Arrabida, V. N. Gaia, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-3767
Eloi MarijonUniversity of Paris, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7227-3428
Rui ProvidenciaBarts Heart Centre, St. Bartholomew's Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9141-9883
Carlo de AsmundisHeart Rhythm Management Centre, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel-Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Laarbeeklaan 101, 1090, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9351-0760
Julian K R ChunCCB, Cardiology, Med. Klinik III, Markuskrankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2355-6015
Michał M Farkowski2nd Department of Heart Arrhythmia, National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1673-7712
Giulio ConteDivision of Cardiology, Cardiocentro Ticino Institute, Lugano, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2248-3456
Serge BovedaHeart Rhythm Department, Clinique Pasteur, 31076 Toulouse, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1280-7042
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BEEpatocentro Ticino · CHHospital da Luz · PTInserm · FRInstitute of Cardiology · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsInformation provided to patients prior to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) insertion and their participation in the decision-making process are crucial for understanding ICD function and accepting this lifelong therapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the extent to which different aspects related to ICD and quality of life were transmitted to patients prior to ICD implantation. METHODS AND

resultsProspective, multicenter European study with an online questionnaire initiated by the European Heart Rhythm Association. The questionnaire was filled-in directly and personally by the ICD patients who were invited to participate. A total of 1809 patients (majority in their 40s-70s, with 624 women, 34.5%) from 10 European countries participated in the study. The median time from first ICD implantation was 5 years (interquartile range 2-10). Overall, 1155 patients (71.5%) felt optimally informed at the time of device implantation, however many respondents received no information about ICD-related complications (n = 801, 49.6%), driving restrictions (n = 718, 44.5%), and possibility of end-of-life ICD deactivation (n = 408, 25.4%). Of note, women were less frequently involved in the decision-making process than men (47.3% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.003) and reported to be less often optimally informed before ICD implantation than men (61.2% vs. 76.8%, P < 0.001). More women mentioned the desire to have learned more about ICD therapy and the benefit/risk balance (45.4% vs. 33.7% of men; P < 0.001).

conclusionsThis patient-based evaluation provides alarming findings on the lack of information provided to patients prior ICD implantation, particularly for women.

Indexed as

Defibrillators, ImplantableQuality of LifeDeath, Sudden, CardiacElectric CountershockEuropeFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesComplicationPatient-centred carePatients’ valuesShared decision-makingSudden death

Identifiers

PMID36691111
PMCPMC10062348
OpenAlexW4317866598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.