Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691096›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental microbiome2023

Leveraging microbiome rediversification for the ecological rescue of soil function.

William L King, Sarah C Richards, Laura M Kaminsky, Brosi A Bradley, Jason P Kaye, Terrence H Bell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental microbiome, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William L KingDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 317 Buckhout Lab, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Sarah C RichardsDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 317 Buckhout Lab, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Laura M KaminskyDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 317 Buckhout Lab, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Brosi A BradleyDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Jason P KayeIntercollege Graduate Degree Program in Ecology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, 16802, USA.
Terrence H BellDepartment of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, The Pennsylvania State University, 317 Buckhout Lab, University Park, PA, 16802, USA. terrence.bell@utoronto.ca.
Pennsylvania State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobal biodiversity losses threaten ecosystem services and can impact important functional insurance in a changing world. Microbial diversity and function can become depleted in agricultural systems and attempts to rediversify agricultural soils rely on either targeted microbial introductions or retaining natural lands as biodiversity reservoirs. As many soil functions are provided by a combination of microbial taxa, rather than outsized impacts by single taxa, such functions may benefit more from diverse microbiome additions than additions of individual commercial strains. In this study, we measured the impact of soil microbial diversity loss and rediversification (i.e. rescue) on nitrification by quantifying ammonium and nitrate pools. We manipulated microbial assemblages in two distinct soil types, an agricultural and a forest soil, with a dilution-to-extinction approach and performed a microbiome rediversification experiment by re-introducing microorganisms lost from the dilution. A microbiome water control was included to act as a reference point. We assessed disruption and potential restoration of (1) nitrification, (2) bacterial and fungal composition through 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS amplicon sequencing and (3) functional genes through shotgun metagenomic sequencing on a subset of samples.

resultsDisruption of nitrification corresponded with diversity loss, but nitrification was successfully rescued in the rediversification experiment when high diversity inocula were introduced. Bacterial composition clustered into groups based on high and low diversity inocula. Metagenomic data showed that genes responsible for the conversion of nitrite to nitrate and taxa associated with nitrogen metabolism were absent in the low diversity inocula microcosms but were rescued with high diversity introductions.

conclusionsIn contrast to some previous work, our data suggest that soil functions can be rescued by diverse microbiome additions, but that the concentration of the microbial inoculum is important. By understanding how microbial rediversification impacts soil microbiome performance, we can further our toolkit for microbial management in human-controlled systems in order to restore depleted microbial functions.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCommunity inoculumMicrobial establishmentMicrobial functionNitrification

Identifiers

PMID36691096
PMCPMC9872425
OpenAlexW4317805382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.