Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691077›Full record

ReviewCancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society2023

Contrast enhanced mammography: focus on frequently encountered benign and malignant diagnoses.

Mindy L Yang, Chandni Bhimani, Robyn Roth, Pauline Germaine

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Contrast-enhanced mammography improves patient access to functional breast imaging.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mindy L YangDepartment of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Chandni BhimaniDepartment of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Robyn RothDepartment of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA.
Pauline GermaineDepartment of Radiology, Cooper University Hospital, 1 Cooper Plaza, Camden, NJ, 08103, USA. germaine-pauline@cooperhealth.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2052-527X
Cooper University Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is becoming a widely adopted modality in breast imaging over the past few decades and exponentially so over the last few years, with strong evidence of high diagnostic performance in cancer detection. Evidence is also growing indicating comparative performance of CEM to MRI in sensitivity with fewer false positive rates. As application of CEM ranges from potential use in screening dense breast populations to staging of known breast malignancy, increased familiarity with the modality and its implementation, and disease processes encountered becomes of great clinical significance. This review emphasizes expected normal findings on CEM followed by a focus on examples of the commonly encountered benign and malignant pathologies on CEM.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammographyBreastBreast DensityContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaContrast-enhanced mammographyContrast mammographyMammography

Identifiers

PMID36691077
PMCPMC9872331
OpenAlexW4317757203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.