Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36691030›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

MRI-based brain tumor detection using convolutional deep learning methods and chosen machine learning techniques.

Soheila Saeedi, Sorayya Rezayi, Hamidreza Keshavarz, Sharareh R Niakan Kalhori

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06750458 (Comparative Study Between Dapagliflozin Versus Dexamethasone Role in Pre-operative Management of Non- Diabetic Brain Tumor Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 86 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
61.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06750458 phase3not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Study Between Dapagliflozin Versus Dexamethasone Role in Pre-operative Management of Non- Diabetic Brain Tumor Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorTanta UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled75ConditionsGlioma, Dapagliflozin (Forxiga), DexamethasoneArmsDapagliflozin placebo, Placebo, DexamethasoneGroup III (n=25) (Dexamethasone group)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 501 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Hybrid fractal ConvXGBNet for brain tumor classification with log-cosh dice loss - cascaded V-Net based segmentation based on MRI images.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Soheila SaeediMedical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran.
Sorayya RezayiMedical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran. sorayya_rezayi@yahoo.com.
Hamidreza KeshavarzFaculty of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
Sharareh R Niakan KalhoriMedical Informatics and Health Information Management Department, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 3rd Floor, No #17, Farredanesh Alley, Ghods St, Enghelab Ave, Tehran, 14177-44361, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRTarbiat Modares University · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetecting brain tumors in their early stages is crucial. Brain tumors are classified by biopsy, which can only be performed through definitive brain surgery. Computational intelligence-oriented techniques can help physicians identify and classify brain tumors. Herein, we proposed two deep learning methods and several machine learning approaches for diagnosing three types of tumor, i.e., glioma, meningioma, and pituitary gland tumors, as well as healthy brains without tumors, using magnetic resonance brain images to enable physicians to detect with high accuracy tumors in early stages. MATERIALS AND

methodsA dataset containing 3264 Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) brain images comprising images of glioma, meningioma, pituitary gland tumors, and healthy brains were used in this study. First, preprocessing and augmentation algorithms were applied to MRI brain images. Next, we developed a new 2D Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) and a convolutional auto-encoder network, both of which were already trained by our assigned hyperparameters. Then 2D CNN includes several convolution layers; all layers in this hierarchical network have a 2*2 kernel function. This network consists of eight convolutional and four pooling layers, and after all convolution layers, batch-normalization layers were applied. The modified auto-encoder network includes a convolutional auto-encoder network and a convolutional network for classification that uses the last output encoder layer of the first part. Furthermore, six machine-learning techniques that were applied to classify brain tumors were also compared in this study.

resultsThe training accuracy of the proposed 2D CNN and that of the proposed auto-encoder network were found to be 96.47% and 95.63%, respectively. The average recall values for the 2D CNN and auto-encoder networks were 95% and 94%, respectively. The areas under the ROC curve for both networks were 0.99 or 1. Among applied machine learning methods, Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) (28%) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) (86%) achieved the lowest and highest accuracy rates, respectively. Statistical tests showed a significant difference between the means of the two methods developed in this study and several machine learning methods (p-value < 0.05).

conclusionThe present study shows that the proposed 2D CNN has optimal accuracy in classifying brain tumors. Comparing the performance of various CNNs and machine learning methods in diagnosing three types of brain tumors revealed that the 2D CNN achieved exemplary performance and optimal execution time without latency. This proposed network is less complex than the auto-encoder network and can be employed by radiologists and physicians in clinical systems for brain tumor detection.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGliomaMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaPituitary NeoplasmsHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrain tumorConvolutional neural networkMachine learningMedical imaging

Identifiers

PMID36691030
PMCPMC9872362
OpenAlexW4317802907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.