Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690960›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2023

Clinical outcomes in patients relapsed/refractory after ≥2 prior lines of therapy for follicular lymphoma: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

Steve Kanters, Graeme Ball, Brad Kahl, Adriana Wiesinger, Eve H Limbrick-Oldfield, Akshay Sudhindra, Julia Thornton Snider, Anik R Patel

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03105336 (A Phase 2 Multicenter Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03105336 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase 2 Multicenter Study of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in Subjects With Relapsed/Refractory Indolent Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (iNHL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorKite, A Gilead CompanyRan2017 to 2024Enrolled159ConditionsFollicular Lymphoma, Marginal Zone Lymphoma, Indolent Non-Hodgkin LymphomaArmsAxicabtagene ciloleucel, Cyclophosphamide, Fludarabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Steve KantersRainCity Analytics, Vancouver, BC, Canada. skanters@raincity-analytics.com.
Graeme BallGilead Sciences Canada, Inc., Mississauga, Canada.
Brad KahlOncology Division, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Adriana WiesingerKite, A Gilead Company, London, UK.
Eve H Limbrick-OldfieldRainCity Analytics, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Akshay SudhindraKite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, USA.
Julia Thornton SniderKite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, USA.
Anik R PatelKite, A Gilead Company, Santa Monica, USA.
Gilead Sciences (Canada) · CAGilead Sciences (United Kingdom) · GBRaincoast Conservation Foundation · CAWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with follicular lymphoma (FL) can have high response rates to early lines of treatment. However, among FL patients relapsed/refractory (r/r) after ≥2 prior lines of therapy (LOT), remission tends to be shorter and there is limited treatment guidance. This study sought to evaluate the clinical outcomes for r/r FL after ≥2 prior LOT identified through systematic literature review.

methodsEligible studies included comparative or non-comparative interventional or observational studies of systemic therapies among adults with FL r/r after ≥2 prior LOT published prior to 31st May 2021. Prior LOT must have included an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody and an alkylating agent, in combination or separately. Overall response rate (ORR) and complete response (CR) were estimated using inverse-variance weighting with Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformations. Kaplan-Meier (KM) curves for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) estimated by reconstructing digitized curves using the Guyot algorithm, and survival analyses were conducted, stratified by ≥2 prior LOT and ≥ 3 prior LOT groups (as defined in the source material). Restricting the analyses to the observational cohorts was investigated as a sensitivity analysis.

resultsThe analysis-set included 20 studies published between 2014 and 2021. Studies were primarily US and/or European based, with the few exceptions using treatments approved in US/Europe. The estimated ORR was 58.47% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 51.13-65.62) and proportion of patients with CR was 19.63% (95% CI: 15.02-24.68). The median OS among those ≥2 prior LOT was 56.57 months (95% CI: 47.8-68.78) and median PFS was 9.78 months (95% CI: 9.01-10.63). The 24-month OS decreased from 66.50% in the ≥2 prior LOT group to 59.51% in the ≥3 prior LOT group, with a similar trend in PFS at 24-month (28.42% vs 24.13%).

conclusionsThis study found that few r/r FL patients with ≥2 prior LOT achieve CR, and despite some benefit, approximately 1/3 of treated patients die within 24 months. The shorter median PFS with increasing prior LOT suggest treatment durability is suboptimal in later LOT. These findings indicate that patients are underserved by treatments currently available in the US and Europe.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsLymphoma, FollicularAdultAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsHumansProgression-Free SurvivalRituximabAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic AgentsRituximabClinical outcomesMeta-analysisRelapsed/refractory follicular lymphomaSystematic literature review

Identifiers

PMID36690960
PMCPMC9869623
OpenAlexW4317734394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.