Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690954›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2023

Stakeholders' experiences and perception on transitional care initiatives within an integrated care project in Belgium: a qualitative interview study.

Merel Leithaus, Amal Fakha, Johan Flamaing, Hilde Verbeek, Mieke Deschodt, Gijs van Pottelbergh, Geert Goderis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. User Involvement in Transition Care in Virtual 4-Party Meetings: A Qualitative Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Merel LeithausAcademic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Amal FakhaAcademic Center for Nursing and Midwifery, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johan FlamaingDivision of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Hilde VerbeekDepartment of Health Services Research, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Mieke DeschodtDivision of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Gijs van PottelberghAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Geert GoderisAcademic Center for General Practice, Department of Public Health & Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. geert.goderis@kuleuven.be.
KU Leuven · BEMaastricht University · NLDepartment of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn 2015, a plan for integrated care was launched by the Belgium government that resulted in the implementation of 12 integrated care pilot project across Belgium. The pilot project Zorgzaam Leuven consists of a multidisciplinary local consortium aiming to bring lasting change towards integrated care for the region of Leuven. This study aims to explore experiences and perceptions of stakeholders involved in four transitional care actions that are part of Zorgzaam Leuven.

methodsThis qualitative case study is part of the European TRANS-SENIOR project. Four actions with a focus on improving transitional care were selected and stakeholders involved in those actions were identified using the snow-ball method. Fourteen semi-structured interviews were conducted and inductive thematic analysis was performed.

resultsProfessionals appreciated to be involved in the decision making early onwards either by proposing own initiatives or by providing their input in shaping actions. Improved team spirit and community feeling with other health care professionals (HCPs) was reported to reduce communication barriers and was perceived to benefit both patients and professionals. The actions provided supportive tools and various learning opportunities that participants acknowledged. Technical shortcomings (e.g. lack of integrated patient records) and financial and political support were identified as key challenges impeding the sustainable implementation of the transitional care actions.

conclusionThe pilot project Zorgzaam Leuven created conditions that triggered work motivation for HCPs. It supported the development of multidisciplinary care partnerships at the local level that allowed early involvement and increased collaboration, which is crucial to successfully improve transitional care for vulnerable patients.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedTransitional CareBelgiumHumansPerceptionPilot ProjectsQualitative ResearchContinuity of patient careHealth care policyIntegrated careInterdisciplinary communicationQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID36690954
PMCPMC9868499
OpenAlexW4317734470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.