Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690882›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2023

Radiomics prognostic analysis of PET/CT images in a multicenter head and neck cancer cohort: investigating ComBat strategies, sub-volume characterization, and automatic segmentation.

Hui Xu, Nassib Abdallah, Jean-Marie Marion, Pierre Chauvet, Clovis Tauber, Thomas Carlier, Lijun Lu, Mathieu Hatt

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Development and validation of anAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hui XuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Nassib AbdallahLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.
Jean-Marie MarionLARIS, Univ Angers, EA7315, Angers, France.
Pierre ChauvetLARIS, Univ Angers, EA7315, Angers, France.
Clovis TauberINSERM U930, Université François Rabelais de Tours, Tours, France.
Thomas CarlierNuclear Medicine Department, CHU and CRCINA, INSERM, CNRS, Univ Angers, Univ Nantes, Nantes, France.
Lijun LuSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, 1023 Shatai Road, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. ljlubme@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-7001-4892
Mathieu HattLaTIM, INSERM, UMR 1101, University Brest, Brest, France.

Funding

China Scholarship Council 202108440348National Natural Science Foundation of China 12026601National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871437
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to investigate the impact of several ComBat harmonization strategies, intra-tumoral sub-volume characterization, and automatic segmentations for progression-free survival (PFS) prediction through radiomics modeling for patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) in PET/CT images.

methodsThe HECKTOR MICCAI 2021 challenge set containing PET/CT images and clinical data of 325 oropharynx HNC patients was exploited. A total of 346 IBSI-compliant radiomic features were extracted for each patient's primary tumor volume defined by the reference manual contours. Modeling relied on least absolute shrinkage Cox regression (Lasso-Cox) for feature selection (FS) and Cox proportional-hazards (CoxPH) models were built to predict PFS. Within this methodological framework, 8 different strategies for ComBat harmonization were compared, including before or after FS, in feature groups separately or all features directly, and with center or clustering-determined labels. Features extracted from tumor sub-volume clustering were also investigated for their prognostic additional value. Finally, 3 automatic segmentations (2 threshold-based and a 3D U-Net) were also compared. All results were evaluated with the concordance index (C-index).

resultsRadiomics features without harmonization, combined with clinical factors, led to models with C-index values of 0.69 in the testing set. The best version of ComBat harmonization, i.e., after FS, for feature groups separately and relying on clustering-determined labels, achieved a C-index of 0.71. The use of features extracted from tumor sub-volumes further improved the C-index to 0.72. Models that relied on the automatic segmentations yielded close but slightly lower prognostic performance (0.67-0.70) compared to reference contours.

conclusionA standard radiomics pipeline allowed for prediction of PFS in a multicenter HNC cohort. Applying a specific strategy of ComBat harmonization improved the performance. The extraction of intra-tumoral sub-volume features and automatic segmentation could contribute to the improvement and automation of prognosis modeling, respectively.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyHumansPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsAutomatic segmentationComBatPET/CTRadiomicsSub-volume

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.