Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690878›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Association of Cumulative Colorectal Surgery Hospital Costs, Readmissions, and Emergency Department/Observation Stays with Insurance Type.

Michael A Jacobs, Jasmine C Tetley, Jeongsoo Kim, Susanne Schmidt, Bradley B Brimhall, Virginia Mika, Chen-Pin Wang, Laura S Manuel, Paul Damien, Paula K Shireman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Michael A Jacobs *Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jasmine C Tetley *Department of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Jeongsoo KimDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Susanne SchmidtDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Bradley B BrimhallDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Virginia MikaUniversity Health, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Chen-Pin WangDepartment of Population Health Sciences, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Laura S ManuelBusiness Intelligence and Data Analytics, University of Texas Health Physicians, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Paul DamienDepartment of Information, Risk, and Operations Management, School of Business, University of Texas, Red McCombs, Austin, TX, USA.
Paula K ShiremanDepartment of Surgery, University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. Shireman@tamu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9701-5422
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USTexas A&M University – San Antonio · USThe University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUM1TR004538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI ROBERT A CLARK, Kenneth M Hargreaves · 2023 to 2026
$22.3M
Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR002645 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2018 to 2022
$20.4M
San Antonio OAIC - Research Education Component (REC)P30AG044271 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI Adam Salmon · 2015 to 2026
$14.1M
Harnessing the power of CTSA-CDRN data networks: Using social determinants of health, frailty and functional status to identify at-risk patients and improve risk adjustmentU01TR002393 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI SHIREMAN, PAULA K · 2018 to 2021
$3.1M
NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR002393NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002645NCATS NIH HHS UM1 TR004538NIA NIH HHS P30 AG044271NIA NIH HHS P30AG044271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/purposeMedicare's Hospital Readmission Reduction Program disproportionately penalizes safety-net hospitals (SNH) caring for vulnerable populations. This study assessed the association of insurance type with 30-day emergency department visits/observation stays (EDOS), readmissions, and cumulative costs in colorectal surgery patients.

methodsRetrospective inpatient cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2013-2019) with cost data in a SNH. The odds of EDOS and readmissions and cumulative variable (index hospitalization and all 30-day EDOS and readmissions) costs were modeled adjusting for frailty, case status, presence of a stoma, and open versus laparoscopic surgery.

resultsThe cohort had 245 private, 195 Medicare, and 590 Medicaid/uninsured cases, with a mean age 55.0 years (SD = 13.3) and 52.9% of the cases were performed on male patients. Most cases were open surgeries (58.7%). Complication rates were 41.8%, EDOS 12.0%, and readmissions 20.1%. Medicaid/uninsured had increased odds of urgent/emergent surgeries (aOR = 2.15, CI = 1.56-2.98, p < 0.001) and complications (aOR = 1.43, CI = 1.02-2.03, p = 0.042) versus private patients. Medicaid/uninsured versus private patients had higher EDOS (16.6% versus 4.1%) and readmissions (22.9% versus 14.3%) rates and higher odds of EDOS (aOR = 4.81, CI = 2.57-10.06, p < 0.001), and readmissions (aOR = 1.62, CI = 1.07-2.50, p = 0.025), while Medicare patients had similar odds versus private. Cumulative variable cost %change was increased for Medicare and Medicaid/uninsured, but Medicaid/uninsured was similar to private after adjusting for urgent/emergent cases.

conclusionsIncreased urgent/emergent cases in Medicaid/uninsured populations drive increased complications odds and higher costs compared to private patients, suggesting lack of access to outpatient care. SNH care for higher cost populations, receive lower reimbursements, and are penalized by value-based programs. Increasing healthcare access for Medicaid/uninsured patients could reduce urgent/emergent surgeries, resulting in fewer complications, EDOS/readmissions, and costs.

Indexed as

Colorectal SurgeryInsuranceAgedCohort StudiesEmergency Service, HospitalHospital CostsHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedPatient ReadmissionRetrospective StudiesUnited StatesUrgent surgeryVariable costsVulnerable populations

Identifiers

PMID36690878
PMCPMC10133377
OpenAlexW4317797500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.