Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690859›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Perilesional resection technique of glioblastoma: intraoperative ultrasound and histological findings of the resection borders in a single center experience.

Carlo Giussani, Giorgio Carrabba, Chiara Benedetta Rui, Gaia Chiarello, Giovanni Stefanoni, Chiara Julita, Andrea De Vito, Maria Allegra Cinalli, Gianpaolo Basso, Paolo Remida and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Obstacles and Trials in Treating Primary Brain Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlo GiussaniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy. carlo.giussani@unimib.it.
Giorgio CarrabbaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Benedetta RuiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gaia ChiarelloNeuropathology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, MB, 20900, Monza, Italy.
Giovanni StefanoniNeurology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Chiara JulitaRadiotherapy, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Andrea De VitoNeuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Maria Allegra CinalliDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Gianpaolo BassoDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Paolo RemidaNeuroradiology, Fondazione IRCCS San Gerardo dei Tintori, Via Pergolesi 33, 20900, Monza, MB, Italy.
Giuseppe CiterioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Andrea Di CristoforiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITAzienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo · ITUniversity of Milano-Bicocca · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe surgical goal in glioblastoma treatment is the maximal safe resection of the tumor. Currently the lack of consensus on surgical technique opens different approaches. This study describes the "perilesional technique" and its outcomes in terms of the extent of resection, progression free survival and overall survival.

methodsPatients included (n = 40) received a diagnosis of glioblastoma and underwent surgery using the perilesional dissection technique at "San Gerardo Hospital"between 2018 and 2021. The tumor core was progressively isolated using a circumferential movement, healthy brain margins were protected with Cottonoid patties in a "shingles on the roof" fashion, then the tumorwas removed en bloc. Intraoperative ultrasound (iOUS) was used and at least 1 bioptic sample of "healthy" margin of the resection was collected and analyzed. The extent of resection was quantified. Extent of surgical resection (EOR) and progression free survival (PFS)were safety endpoints of the procedure.

resultsThirty-four patients (85%) received a gross total resection(GTR) while 3 (7.5%) patients received a sub-total resection (STR), and 3 (7.5%) a partial resection (PR). The mean post-operative residual volume was 1.44 cm

conclusionsPerilesional resection is an efficient technique which aims to bring the surgeon to a safe environment, carefully reaching the "healthy" brain before removing the tumoren bloc. This technique can achieve excellent tumor margins, extent of resection, and preservation of apatient's functions.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaSurgeonsBrainConsensusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresRetrospective StudiesUltrasonographyBrain tumorsEn bloc resectionExtent of resectionGlioblastomaIntraoperative ultrasoundNeurosurgeryPerilesional resectionProgression free survival

Identifiers

PMID36690859
PMCPMC9992251
OpenAlexW4317792284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.