Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690774›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2023

Automated prostate multi-regional segmentation in magnetic resonance using fully convolutional neural networks.

Ana Jimenez-Pastor, Rafael Lopez-Gonzalez, Belén Fos-Guarinos, Fabio Garcia-Castro, Mark Wittenberg, Asunción Torregrosa-Andrés, Luis Marti-Bonmati, Margarita Garcia-Fontes, Pablo Duarte, Juan Pablo Gambini and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Practical applications of AI in body imaging.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ana Jimenez-PastorQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain. anajimenez@quibim.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0978-9429
Rafael Lopez-GonzalezQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Belén Fos-GuarinosQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Fabio Garcia-CastroQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Mark WittenbergQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.
Asunción Torregrosa-AndrésDepartment of Radiology and GIBI230 Research Group On Biomedical Imaging, Hospital Universitario Y Politécnico de La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Luis Marti-BonmatiDepartment of Radiology and GIBI230 Research Group On Biomedical Imaging, Hospital Universitario Y Politécnico de La Fe and Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain.
Margarita Garcia-FontesCentro Uruguayo de Imagenologia Molecular (CUDIM), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Pablo DuarteCentro Uruguayo de Imagenologia Molecular (CUDIM), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Juan Pablo GambiniCentro Uruguayo de Imagenologia Molecular (CUDIM), Montevideo, Uruguay.
Leonardo Kayat BittencourtUniversity Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, USA.
Felipe Campos KitamuraDasaInova, Dasa, Unifesp, São Paulo, Brazil.
Vasantha Kumar VenugopalMahajan Imaging, New Delhi, India.
Vidur MahajanMahajan Imaging, New Delhi, India.
Pablo RosStony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
Emilio Soria-OlivasIntelligent Data Analysis Laboratory (IDAL), ETSE, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Angel Alberich-BayarriQuantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Medicine (Quibim S.L.), Aragon Avenue, 30, 13th floor, Office I-J, 46021, Valencia, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAutomatic MR imaging segmentation of the prostate provides relevant clinical benefits for prostate cancer evaluation such as calculation of automated PSA density and other critical imaging biomarkers. Further, automated T2-weighted image segmentation of central-transition zone (CZ-TZ), peripheral zone (PZ), and seminal vesicle (SV) can help to evaluate clinically significant cancer following the PI-RADS v2.1 guidelines. Therefore, the main objective of this work was to develop a robust and reproducible CNN-based automatic prostate multi-regional segmentation model using an intercontinental cohort of prostate MRI.

methodsA heterogeneous database of 243 T2-weighted prostate studies from 7 countries and 10 machines of 3 different vendors, with the CZ-TZ, PZ, and SV regions manually delineated by two experienced radiologists (ground truth), was used to train (n = 123) and test (n = 120) a U-Net-based model with deep supervision using a cyclical learning rate. The performance of the model was evaluated by means of dice similarity coefficient (DSC), among others. Segmentation results with a DSC above 0.7 were considered accurate.

resultsThe proposed method obtained a DSC of 0.88 ± 0.01, 0.85 ± 0.02, 0.72 ± 0.02, and 0.72 ± 0.02 for the prostate gland, CZ-TZ, PZ, and SV respectively in the 120 studies of the test set when comparing the predicted segmentations with the ground truth. No statistically significant differences were found in the results obtained between manufacturers or continents.

conclusionProstate multi-regional T2-weighted MR images automatic segmentation can be accurately achieved by U-Net like CNN, generalizable in a highly variable clinical environment with different equipment, acquisition configurations, and population. KEY POINTS: • Deep learning techniques allows the accurate segmentation of the prostate in three different regions on MR T2w images. • Multi-centric database proved the generalization of the CNN model on different institutions across different continents. • CNN models can be used to aid on the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMaleNeural Networks, ComputerProstateArtificial intelligenceDeep learningDiagnosis computer-assistedMagnetic resonance imagingProstate

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.