Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690721›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2023

Prognostic refinement of NSMP high-risk endometrial cancers using oestrogen receptor immunohistochemistry.

Lisa Vermij, Jan J Jobsen, Alicia León-Castillo, Mariel Brinkhuis, Suzan Roothaan, Melanie E Powell, Stephanie M de Boer, Pearly Khaw, Linda R Mileshkin, Anthony Fyles and 12 more

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
43.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SEOM-GEICO clinical guidelines on endometrial cancer (2025).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Molecular profile in endometrial carcinoma: can we predict the lymph node status? A systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Molecular subtypes and survival patterns of endometrial cancer in a South Indian cohort.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 10 institutions in 5 countries.

Lisa VermijDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4687-5550
Jan J JobsenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7663-0170
Alicia León-CastilloDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mariel BrinkhuisDepartment of Pathology, Laboratorium Pathologie Oost-Nederland, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Suzan RoothaanDepartment of Pathology, Laboratorium Pathologie Oost-Nederland, Hengelo, The Netherlands.
Melanie E PowellDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Barts and The London NHS Trust, London, UK.
Stephanie M de BoerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pearly KhawDivision of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Linda R MileshkinDivision of Cancer Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Anthony FylesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Alexandra LearyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Catherine GenestieDepartment of Pathology, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Ina M Jürgenliemk-SchulzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Emma J CrosbieGynaecological Oncology Research Group, Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, St. Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0284-8630
Helen J MackayDepartment of Medical Oncology, Odette Cancer Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Gynaecology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1821-3042
Remi A NoutDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Vincent T H B M SmitDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Carien L CreutzbergDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7008-4321
Nanda HorewegDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tjalling BosseDepartment of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. T.Bosse@lumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6881-8437
TransPORTEC Consortium
Leiden University Medical Center · NLInstitut Gustave Roussy · FRPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AUBarts Health NHS Trust · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBMedisch Spectrum Twente · NLPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre · CASunnybrook Health Science Centre · CAUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk-assessment of endometrial cancer (EC) is based on clinicopathological factors and molecular subgroup. It is unclear whether adding hormone receptor expression, L1CAM expression or CTNNB1 status yields prognostic refinement.

methodsParaffin-embedded tumour samples of women with high-risk EC (HR-EC) from the PORTEC-3 trial (n = 424), and a Dutch prospective clinical cohort called MST (n = 256), were used. All cases were molecularly classified. Expression of L1CAM, ER and PR were analysed by whole-slide immunohistochemistry and CTNNB1 mutations were assessed with a next-generation sequencing. Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox's proportional hazard models were used for survival analysis.

resultsIn total, 648 HR-EC were included. No independent prognostic value of ER, PR, L1CAM, and CTNNB1 was found, while age, stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy had an independent impact on risk of recurrence. Subgroup-analysis showed that only in NSMP HR-EC, ER-positivity was independently associated with a reduced risk of recurrence (HR 0.33, 95%CI 0.15-0.75).

conclusionsWe confirmed the prognostic impact of the molecular classification, age, stage, and adjuvant CTRT in a large cohort of high-risk EC. ER-positivity is a strong favourable prognostic factor in NSMP HR-EC and identifies a homogeneous subgroup of NSMP tumours. Assessment of ER status in high-risk NSMP EC is feasible in clinical practice and could improve risk stratification and treatment.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Biomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryPrognosisProspective StudiesReceptors, EstrogenBiomarkers, TumorNeural Cell Adhesion Molecule L1Receptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID36690721
PMCPMC10050005
OpenAlexW4317718278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read54
identifiers read1
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.