Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690558›Full record

ArticleVaccine2023

COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy and uptake: Perspectives from people released from the Federal Bureau of Prisons.

Camille Kramer, Minna Song, Carolyn B Sufrin, Gabriel B Eber, Leonard S Rubenstein, Brendan Saloner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Perceptions of COVID-19 vaccine side effects by political affiliation.Journal of public health (Oxford, England) · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camille KramerJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 4940 Eastern Ave., A101 Baltimore, MD 21224, USA. Electronic address: ckramer@jhu.edu.
Minna SongDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Carolyn B SufrinJohns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 4940 Eastern Ave., A101 Baltimore, MD 21224, USA; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health, Behavior and Society, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Gabriel B EberJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Leonard S RubensteinJohns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Brendan SalonerDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People in United States (US) prisons and jails have been disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This is due to challenges containing outbreaks in facilities and the high rates of health conditions that increase the risk of adverse outcomes. Vaccination is one strategy to disrupt COVID-19 transmission, but there are many factors impeding vaccination while in custody. We aimed to examine the perspectives of former residents in the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) regarding COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and acceptance. Between September-October 2021, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 recently released individuals who were incarcerated before and during COVID-19 and coded transcripts thematically. We assessed perceptions of the vaccine rollout and factors shaping vaccination uptake in custody and after release. The vaccine was available to seven participants in custody, of whom three were vaccinated. Interviewees had mixed attitudes about how vaccines were distributed, particularly with priority given to staff. Most were reluctant to get vaccinated in custody for varying reasons including observing staff declining to be vaccinated, lack of counseling to address specific questions about safety, and general lack of trust in the carceral system. By contrast, twelve got vaccinated post-release because of greater trust in community health care and stated they would not have done so while incarcerated. For residents in the BOP, COVID-19 vaccination was not simply a binary decision, instead they weighed the costs and benefits with most deciding against getting vaccinated. Institutions of incarceration must address these concerns to increase vaccine uptake as the pandemic continues.

Indexed as

COVID-19PrisonsCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansPandemicsVaccination HesitancyCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19COVID-19 vaccineIncarcerationLack of trustPrisonVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID36690558
PMCPMC9866228

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.