Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690496›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

Patients' Experiences With Therapeutic Approaches for Post-COVID Syndrome: Results of a Crowdsourced Research Survey.

Carina Klocke, Jan Valentini, Regina Stolz, Lena Gaßner, Stefanie Joos, Christian Förster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Accessing Care Services for Long COVID Sufferers in Alberta, Canada: A Random, Cross-Sectional Survey Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carina KlockeInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany carina.klocke@med.uni-tuebingen.de.
Jan ValentiniInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Regina StolzInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Lena GaßnerInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Stefanie JoosInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.
Christian FörsterInstitute for General Practice and Interprofessional Care, University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some patients develop multiple protracted sequelae after infection with SARS-CoV-2, collectively known as post-COVID syndrome or long COVID. To date, there is no evidence showing benefit of specific therapies for this condition, and patients likely resort to self-initiated therapies. We aimed to obtain information about therapies used by and needs of this population via inductive crowdsourcing research. Patients completed an online questionnaire about their symptoms and experiences with therapeutic approaches. Responses of 499 participants suggested few approaches (eg, mind-body medicine, respiratory therapy) had positive effects and showed a great need for patient-centered communication (eg, more recognition of this syndrome). Our findings can help design clinical studies and underscore the importance of the holistic approach to care provided by family medicine.

Indexed as

COVID-19CrowdsourcingCommunicationHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2chronic disease/therapyCOVID-19/complicationsCOVID-19/therapycrowdsourcing researchfamily medicineholistic carelong COVIDpatient-centered communicationpatient needsself-managementself-medicationsurveys and questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36690496
PMCPMC9870628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.