Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690491›Full record

ArticleAnnals of family medicine

COVID-19 Impacts on Primary Care Clinic Care Management Processes.

Leif I Solberg, Caroline S Carlin, Kevin A Peterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of family medicine. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leif I SolbergHealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota Leif.I.Solberg@HealthPartners.com.
Caroline S CarlinUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Kevin A PetersonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Funding

Understanding Infrastructure Transformation Effects on Diabetes (The UNITED Study)R18DK110732 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CARLIN, CAROLINE S, PETERSON, KEVIN A · 2016 to 2021
$2.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK110732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo learn whether the COVID-19 pandemic's disruptions and associated reduced health outcomes for people with chronic conditions might have been caused by a decrease in care management processes (CMPs) in primary care clinics

methodsLongitudinal cohort design with repeated survey-based measures of CMPs from 2017, 2019, and 2021 in 269 primary care clinics in Minnesota.

resultsThere were only small differences in organizational characteristics and no differences in overall CMPs between the 269 clinics analyzed and the 287 that only completed surveys in 1 or 2 years. Overall CMP scores rose by similar amounts (1.6% and 2.1%) from 2017 to 2019 and from 2019 to 2021. In 2021, CMP scores were lower in small medical groups than in large medical groups in 2017 (66.1% vs 78.5%,

conclusionsAlthough quite disrupted by the pandemic, care management processes for chronic disease care in these resilient primary care clinics actually increased from 2019 to 2021, at least in clinics that were part of large organizations. However, that was not true for clinics from smaller groups and perhaps for other areas of care.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsAmbulatory Care FacilitiesChronic DiseaseHumansMinnesotaPrimary Health CareCOVID-19patient care managementprimary health carequality of health care

Identifiers

PMID36690491
PMCPMC9870648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.