Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690440›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurointerventional surgery2023

Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Siming Gui, Xiheng Chen, Dachao Wei, Dingwei Deng, Wei You, Xiangyu Meng, Jian Lv, Junqiang Feng, Yudi Tang, Shu Yang and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurointerventional surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Safety and efficacy profile of off-label use of the Pipeline Embolization Device: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke Association · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Siming Gui *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7024-7258
Xiheng Chen *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9837-4710
Dachao Wei *Beijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3389-8112
Dingwei DengBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Wei YouBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0466-6486
Xiangyu MengBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7703-1177
Jian LvBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Junqiang FengBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-6510
Yudi TangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3436-7711
Shu YangBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ting ChenSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Peng LiuDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1849-9634
Huijian GeDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hengwei JinDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xinke LiuDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yuhua JiangDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei FengDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Youxiang LiBeijing Neurosurgical Institute, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China liyouxiang@bjtth.org.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Tian Tan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlow diverters have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, the delayed complications associated with flow diverter use are unknown.

objectiveTo evaluate the incidence, severity, clinical outcomes, risk factors, and dynamic changes associated with in-stent stenosis (ISS) after treatment with a Pipeline embolization device (PED).

methodsPatients who underwent PED treatment between 2015 and 2020 were enrolled. The angiographic, clinical, and follow-up data of 459 patients were independently reviewed by four neuroradiologists to identify ISS. Binary logistic regression was conducted to determine ISS risk factors, and an ISS-time curve was established to demonstrate dynamic changes in ISS after PED implantation.

resultsOf the 459 treated patients, 69 (15.0%) developed ISS. At follow-up, nine patients (2.0%) with ISS demonstrated reversal, while 18 (3.9%) developed parental artery occlusion. A total of 380 patients (82.8%) achieved complete aneurysm occlusion (O'Kelly-Marotta grade D). Patients with posterior-circulation aneurysm (OR=2.895, 95% CI (1.732 to 4.838; P<0.001) or balloon angioplasty (OR=1.992, 95% CI 1.162 to 3.414; P=0.037) were more likely to develop ISS. Patients aged >54 years (OR=0.464, 95% CI 0.274 to 0.785; P=0.006) or with a body mass index of >28 kg/m

conclusionsISS is a common, benign, and self-limiting complication of PED implantation in the Chinese population.

Indexed as

Embolization, TherapeuticIntracranial AneurysmCerebral AngiographyConstriction, PathologicHumansStentsTreatment OutcomeAneurysmComplicationFlow DiverterInterventionStenosis

Identifiers

PMID36690440
PMCPMC10715560
OpenAlexW4317801805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.