Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690419›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2023

Early Clinical Outcomes of the Prone Transpsoas Lumbar Interbody Fusion Technique.

Ian J Wellington, Christopher L Antonacci, Chirag Chaudhary, Ergin Coskun, Mark P Cote, Hardeep Singh, Scott S Mallozzi, Isaac L Moss

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Single-Position Lumbar Fusion Online Videos for Patient Education: Understandability, Reliability, and Quality.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Clinical and radiographic outcomes following 120 consecutive patients undergoing prone transpsoas lateral lumbar interbody fusion.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ian J WellingtonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Christopher L AntonacciDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Chirag ChaudharyDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Ergin CoskunDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Mark P CoteDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Hardeep SinghDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Scott S MallozziDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA.
Isaac L MossDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT, USA Imoss@uchc.edu.
University of Connecticut · USUConn Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prone transpsoas (PTP) approach for lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a relatively novel technique. Currently, little is known about its associated complications and early patient-reported outcomes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of LLIF performed via the PTP approach on sagittal radiographic parameters, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and rates of complications.

methodsA retrospective review was performed of 82 consecutive patients who underwent LLIF via a PTP technique. Lumbar lordosis (LL), segmental lordosis (SL), anterior disc height (ADH), and posterior disc height (PDH) were measured on preoperative, initial postoperative, and 3-month postoperative radiographs. PROMs including the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); the visual analog scale (VAS); and pain portions of the EQ5D, VAS back, and VAS leg ratings were collected at the preoperative and subsequent postoperative visits. Length of hospital stay and postoperative complications related to the procedure were recorded.

resultsSignificant improvements were seen at the initial (4.5° ± 8.6°,

conclusionsWhile early PROMs and correction of sagittal radiographic parameters show promising results for the PTP approach for LLIF, it is not without risks. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: PTP interbody fusion is an emerging technique that allows for simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns of the lumbar spine. This early case series demonstrates significant improvement in functional outcomes and lumbar lordosis with a safety profile comparable to other well-established techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3:

Indexed as

complicationslaterallumbaroutcomespronepsoas

Identifiers

PMID36690419
PMCPMC10025834
OpenAlexW4317757215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.