Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690400›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Changes in consultation mode during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic in Croatian family medicine: a cross-sectional study.

Jasna Vučak, Branislava Popovic, Aleksandar Ljubotina, Željko Vojvodić, Diana Sabljak, Tina Zavidić

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jasna VučakKatedra obiteljske medicine, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka, Croatia jasna.vucak@yahoo.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4328-531X
Branislava PopovicKatedra obiteljske medicine, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka, Croatia.
Aleksandar LjubotinaKatedra obiteljske medicine, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka, Croatia.
Željko VojvodićSveučilište Josipa Jurja Strossmayera u Osijeku, Osijek, Osijek-Baranja, Croatia.
Diana SabljakAssociation of Teachers in General Practice/Family Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Tina ZavidićKatedra obiteljske medicine, Sveučilište u Rijeci, Rijeka, Croatia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the changes in the type, length and reasons for consultations in primary healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic in Croatia. This study aimed to test a hypothesis regarding the increased workload of general practitioners (GPs) by introducing more virtual consultations (VCs).

designThe study design was cross-sectional and comprised two phases: retrospective and prospective. The retrospective phase included data from April, May and June of 2019, 2020 and 2021, and the prospective phase included data from 2 weeks in June 2021. Additionally, the number, length and reasons for face-to-face consultations (FTFC), VCs and telephone consultations (TCs) with nurses were collected. SETTING AND

participantsOverall, 6 GPs from different regions in Croatia with 10 125 enlisted patients. MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES: The retrospective phase compared data for consultation types obtained from electronic medical records. The prospective phase collected the number, length and reasons for FTFCs, VCs and TCs with nurses.

resultsFTFCs decreased from 58.1% of the total number of visits in 2019 to 41.2% in 2020, while VC increased from 41.9% in 2019 to 58.8% in 2020. Furthermore, an eightfold increase in email consultations was recorded. The average lengths of an FTFC and TC were 7.13±3.38 and 4.01±2.09 min, respectively; FTFCs were significantly longer than TCs (t=7.038, p<0.0001). There was an increase in the total workload (9.4%) in 2021 compared with 2019.

conclusionCroatian GPs faced changes in work organisation along with increased workload during the pandemic. Despite the shortening of time in FTFCs, the workload has increased due to the increase in VCs. An appropriate legal framework should be implemented for this new form of consultation. Future research is needed to address the impact of these changes on healthcare quality.

Indexed as

COVID-19Family PracticeCroatiaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPandemicsProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesCOVID-19organisation of health servicesprimary caretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36690400
PMCPMC9871868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.