Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690389›Full record

ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2023

Evaluation of

Ines Martin-Martin, Adeline E Williams, Eric Calvo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ines Martin-MartinLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0956-7324
Adeline E WilliamsLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8433-0060
Eric CalvoLaboratory of Malaria and Vector Research, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA ecalvo@niaid.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7880-2730
National Institutes of Health · US

Funding

Arthropod saliva in vector-borne disease transmission: Functional analysis of novel domains in salivary secretionsZIAAI001246 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI CALVO, ERIC · 2019 to 2025
$10.0M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AI001246
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female mosquitoes need vertebrate blood for egg development. Evaluating mosquito behavior is essential for determining the ability of a mosquito to blood feed. Blood feeding experiments are often performed using artificial membrane feeders; however, such experiments do not represent realistic scenarios in which a mosquito injects saliva into the host to prevent host hemostatic responses. Vertebrate animal models are therefore more representative of a natural blood feeding event. Here, we describe a methodology to evaluate mosquito blood feeding success that can be used to compare blood feeding between mosquito groups-for instance, wild-type versus transgenic mosquitoes lacking salivary proteins or field-collected versus laboratory-reared mosquitoes. We also include a simple procedure to measure blood meal size, allowing for a more quantitative assessment of feeding status. The volume of ingested blood directly affects mosquito fecundity and fertility, important markers of fitness. The methods described herein can be used to evaluate transmission-blocking vaccines, insecticides, or fitness costs associated with transgenic mosquitoes.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedFeeding BehaviorFemale

Identifiers

PMID36690389
PMCPMC10750256
OpenAlexW4317870371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.