ArticleCold Spring Harbor protocols2023
Evaluation of
Article in Cold Spring Harbor protocols, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dengue-mediated changes in the vectorial capacity of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae): manipulation of transmission or infection by-product?Journal of medical entomology · 2025Review
- Determination of Mosquito Probing and Feeding Time to Evaluate Mosquito Blood Feeding.Cold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Female mosquitoes need vertebrate blood for egg development. Evaluating mosquito behavior is essential for determining the ability of a mosquito to blood feed. Blood feeding experiments are often performed using artificial membrane feeders; however, such experiments do not represent realistic scenarios in which a mosquito injects saliva into the host to prevent host hemostatic responses. Vertebrate animal models are therefore more representative of a natural blood feeding event. Here, we describe a methodology to evaluate mosquito blood feeding success that can be used to compare blood feeding between mosquito groups-for instance, wild-type versus transgenic mosquitoes lacking salivary proteins or field-collected versus laboratory-reared mosquitoes. We also include a simple procedure to measure blood meal size, allowing for a more quantitative assessment of feeding status. The volume of ingested blood directly affects mosquito fecundity and fertility, important markers of fitness. The methods described herein can be used to evaluate transmission-blocking vaccines, insecticides, or fitness costs associated with transgenic mosquitoes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.