Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36690206›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced research2023

Hierarchical Harris hawks optimizer for feature selection.

Lemin Peng, Zhennao Cai, Ali Asghar Heidari, Lejun Zhang, Huiling Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lemin PengDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China. Electronic address: monodies@163.com.
Zhennao CaiDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China. Electronic address: cznao@wzu.edu.cn.
Ali Asghar HeidariSchool of Surveying and Geospatial Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. Electronic address: as_heidari@ut.ac.ir.
Lejun ZhangCyberspace Institute Advanced Technology, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China; College of Information Engineering, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225127, China; Research and Development Center for E-Learning , Ministry of Education, Beijing 100039, China. Electronic address: zhanglejun@yzu.edu.cn.
Huiling ChenDepartment of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Wenzhou University, Wenzhou 325035, China. Electronic address: chenhuiling.jlu@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe main feature selection methods include filter, wrapper-based, and embedded methods. Because of its characteristics, the wrapper method must include a swarm intelligence algorithm, and its performance in feature selection is closely related to the algorithm's quality. Therefore, it is essential to choose and design a suitable algorithm to improve the performance of the feature selection method based on the wrapper. Harris hawks optimization (HHO) is a superb optimization approach that has just been introduced. It has a high convergence rate and a powerful global search capability but it has an unsatisfactory optimization effect on high dimensional problems or complex problems. Therefore, we introduced a hierarchy to improve HHO's ability to deal with complex problems and feature selection.

objectivesTo make the algorithm obtain good accuracy with fewer features and run faster in feature selection, we improved HHO and named it EHHO. On 30 UCI datasets, the improved HHO (EHHO) can achieve very high classification accuracy with less running time and fewer features.

methodsWe first conducted extensive experiments on 23 classical benchmark functions and compared EHHO with many state-of-the-art metaheuristic algorithms. Then we transform EHHO into binary EHHO (bEHHO) through the conversion function and verify the algorithm's ability in feature extraction on 30 UCI data sets.

resultsExperiments on 23 benchmark functions show that EHHO has better convergence speed and minimum convergence than other peers. At the same time, compared with HHO, EHHO can significantly improve the weakness of HHO in dealing with complex functions. Moreover, on 30 datasets in the UCI repository, the performance of bEHHO is better than other comparative optimization algorithms.

conclusionCompared with the original bHHO, bEHHO can achieve excellent classification accuracy with fewer features and is also better than bHHO in running time.

Indexed as

Enhanced hierarchyFeature selectionHarris hawks optimizerHHOOptimization

Identifiers

PMID36690206
PMCPMC10658428

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.