Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689762›Full record

ArticleClinical child psychology and psychiatry2023

Constructing the

Ebenezer Cudjoe, Cherry Hl Tam, Marcus Yl Chiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical child psychology and psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ebenezer CudjoeCentre for Childhood Studies, Department of Psychosocial and Psychoanalytic Studies, University of Essex, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9908-0834
Cherry Hl TamDepartment of Social and Behavioural Sciences, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Marcus Yl ChiuSchool of Health & Wellbeing, University of Bolton, UK; Centre for Mental Health and Society, Bangor University, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6676-8886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Children living with parental mental illness are referred to as an invisible population because mental health services rarely target them, as the focus is often on the parent who is ill mentally. The same situation occurs even in school where they are unnoticed. This study conducted in Ghana creates awareness about what these children think about their interactions at school in the context of parental mental illness. Data was collected through interviews and diaries with 13 children living with parental mental illness and analysed to attain the essential features through Husserl's transcendental phenomenology. The children find the school as a happy space where they do not have to be worried about the parent's mental illness. Ultimately, though, even at school, most of the children become concerned about the mental wellbeing of the parent due to their loyalty towards them. This results in the school paradox where the children are torn between having their own time at school and being worried about the parent's condition back home, wanting to be there for the parent. The school paradox is an unhealthy cycle that could be addressed with coordinated efforts from mental health professionals, social workers, psychologists and teachers.

Indexed as

Child of Impaired ParentsMental DisordersMental Health ServicesChildHumansParent-Child RelationsParentsChildrenparentparental mental illnessphenomenologyschool

Identifiers

PMID36689762
PMCPMC10540478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.