Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689654›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Conservation successes and challenges for wide-ranging sharks and rays.

Nathan Pacoureau, John K Carlson, Holly K Kindsvater, Cassandra L Rigby, Henning Winker, Colin A Simpfendorfer, Patricia Charvet, Riley A Pollom, Rodrigo Barreto, C Samantha Sherman and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insights from three decades of IUCN Red List assessments catalyzing shark, ray, and chimaera conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Key drivers of at-vessel mortality in demersal sharks.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  6. Predictions of southern migration timing in coastal sharks under future ocean warming.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nathan PacoureauDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060.ORCID 0000-0002-8363-6332
John K CarlsonNational Marine Fisheries Service, Panama City Beach, FL 32408.
Holly K KindsvaterDepartment of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA 24060.
Cassandra L RigbyCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4771-8514
Henning WinkerDepartment of Aquatic Resources, Institute of Marine Research, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden 45330.
Colin A SimpfendorferCollege of Science and Engineering, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0295-2238
Patricia CharvetPrograma de Pós-graduação em Sistemática, Uso e Conservação da Biodiversidade, Fortaleza, Brazil 60020-181.ORCID 0000-0002-8801-433X
Riley A PollomSpecies Recovery Program, Seattle Aquarium, Seattle, WA 98101.ORCID 0000-0001-8260-4614
Rodrigo BarretoCentro Nacional de Pesquisa e Conservação da Biodiversidade Marinha do Sudeste e Sul do Brasil, Instituto Chico Mendes de Conservação da Biodiversidade, 88301-44 Itajaí, Brazil.
C Samantha ShermanEarth to Ocean Research Group, Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7150-1035
Brendan S TalwarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Division of Coastlines and Oceans, Institute of Environment, Florida International University, North Miami, FL 33181.ORCID 0000-0001-6014-5007
Daniel J SkerrittInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
U Rashid SumailaInstitute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1851-1621
Jay H MatsushibaEarth to Ocean Research Group, Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Wade J VanderWrightEarth to Ocean Research Group, Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.
Helen F YanCollege of Science and Engineering, Research Hub for Coral Reef Ecosystem Functions, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9428-9882
Nicholas K DulvyEarth to Ocean Research Group, Biological Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4295-9725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Overfishing is the most significant threat facing sharks and rays. Given the growth in consumption of seafood, combined with the compounding effects of habitat loss, climate change, and pollution, there is a need to identify recovery paths, particularly in poorly managed and poorly monitored fisheries. Here, we document conservation through fisheries management success for 11 coastal sharks in US waters by comparing population trends through a Bayesian state-space model before and after the implementation of the 1993 Fisheries Management Plan for Sharks. We took advantage of the spatial and temporal gradients in fishing exposure and fisheries management in the Western Atlantic to analyze the effect on the Red List status of all 26 wide-ranging coastal sharks and rays. We show that extinction risk was greater where fishing pressure was higher, but this was offset by the strength of management engagement (indicated by strength of National and Regional Plan of Action for sharks and rays). The regional Red List Index (which tracks changes in extinction risk through time) declined in all regions until the 1980s but then improved in the North and Central Atlantic such that the average extinction risk is currently half that in the Southwest. Many sharks and rays are wide ranging, and successful fisheries management in one country can be undone by poorly regulated or unregulated fishing elsewhere. Our study underscores that well-enforced, science-based management of carefully monitored fisheries can achieve conservation success, even for slow-growing species.

Indexed as

SharksAnimalsBayes TheoremConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemFisheriesIUCN red list statusmanagementoverfishingpopulation recoverysustainable fisheries

Identifiers

PMID36689654
PMCPMC9945978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.