Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689651›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2023

Megaherbivores modify forest structure and increase carbon stocks through multiple pathways.

Fabio Berzaghi, François Bretagnolle, Clémentine Durand-Bessart, Stephen Blake

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Timber and trails: Low-intensity selective logging and elephant trails shape seedling dynamics in an Afrotropical forest.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Forest elephants modulate their behaviour to adapt to sounds of danger.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. The need for carbon finance schemes to tackle overexploitation of tropical forest wildlife.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Financing conservation by valuing carbon services produced by wild animals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Fabio BerzaghiLaboratory of Climate and Environmental Sciences (LSCE) - Unité mixte de recherche Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives, 91190, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9139-8274
François BretagnolleUnité mixte de recherche Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS) 6282 Biogéosciences, Université de Bourgogne 21000, Dijon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-0164-840X
Clémentine Durand-BessartDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, 63103, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0001-9896-5078
Stephen BlakeDepartment of Biology, Saint Louis University, 63103, St. Louis, MO.ORCID 0000-0002-2220-1589

Funding

EC | Horizon Europe | Excellent Science | HORIZON EUROPE Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) 845265
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megaherbivores have pervasive ecological effects. In African rainforests, elephants can increase aboveground carbon, though the mechanisms are unclear. Here, we combine a large unpublished dataset of forest elephant feeding with published browsing preferences totaling nearly 200,000 records covering >800 plant species and with nutritional data for 145 species. Elephants increase carbon stocks by: 1) promoting high wood density trees via preferential browsing on leaves from low wood density species, which are more palatable and digestible; and 2) dispersing seeds of trees that are relatively large and have the highest average wood density among tree guilds based on dispersal mode. Loss of forest elephants could cause an increase in abundance of fast-growing low wood density trees and a 6% to 9% decline in aboveground carbon stocks due to regeneration failure of elephant-dispersed trees. These results demonstrate the importance of megaherbivores for maintaining diverse, high-carbon tropical forests. Successful elephant conservation will contribute to climate mitigation at a globally-relevant scale.

Indexed as

ElephantsAnimalsBiomassCarbonForestsTreesTropical ClimateCarbonbiogeochemical cyclescarbon cyclingmegafaunanature-based solutionsplant animal interactions

Identifiers

PMID36689651
PMCPMC9945987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.