Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689492›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Greater than pH 8: The pH dependence of EDTA as a preservative of high molecular weight DNA in biological samples.

Mia L DeSanctis, Elizabeth A Soranno, Ella Messner, Ziyu Wang, Elena M Turner, Rosalia Falco, Hannah J Appiah-Madson, Daniel L Distel

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mia L DeSanctisOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Elizabeth A SorannoOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5773-5778
Ella MessnerOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ziyu WangOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Elena M TurnerOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Rosalia FalcoOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0297-4506
Hannah J Appiah-MadsonOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8408-7729
Daniel L DistelOcean Genome Legacy Center, Marine and Environmental Sciences, Northeastern University, Nahant, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3860-194X
Northeastern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a divalent cation chelator and chemical preservative that has been shown to be the active ingredient of the popular DNA preservative DESS. EDTA may act to reduce DNA degradation during tissue storage by sequestering divalent cations that are required by nucleases naturally occurring in animal tissues. Although EDTA is typically used between pH 7.5 and 8 in preservative preparations, the capacity of EDTA to chelate divalent cations is known to increase with increasing pH. Therefore, increasing the pH of EDTA-containing preservative solutions may improve their effectiveness as DNA preservatives. To test this hypothesis, we stored tissues from five aquatic species in 0.25 M EDTA adjusted to pH 8, 9, and 10 for 12 months at room temperature before DNA isolation. For comparison, tissues from the same specimens were also stored in 95% ethanol. DNA extractions performed on tissues preserved in EDTA pH 9 or 10 resulted in as great or greater percent recovery of high molecular weight DNA than did extractions from tissues stored at pH 8. In all cases examined, percent recovery of high molecular weight DNA from tissues preserved in EDTA pH 10 was significantly better than that observed from tissues preserved in 95% ethanol. Our results support the conclusion that EDTA contributes to DNA preservation in tissues by chelating divalent cations and suggest that preservative performance can be improved by increasing the pH of EDTA-containing DNA preservative solutions.

Indexed as

DNAEthanolAnimalsCations, DivalentChelating AgentsEdetic AcidHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMolecular WeightPreservatives, PharmaceuticalCations, DivalentChelating AgentsDNAEdetic AcidEthanolPreservatives, Pharmaceutical

Identifiers

PMID36689492
PMCPMC9870144
OpenAlexW4317780792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.