Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689468›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

A real-time regional model for COVID-19: Probabilistic situational awareness and forecasting.

Solveig Engebretsen, Alfonso Diz-Lois Palomares, Gunnar Rø, Anja Bråthen Kristoffersen, Jonas Christoffer Lindstrøm, Kenth Engø-Monsen, Meghana Kamineni, Louis Yat Hin Chan, Ørjan Dale, Jørgen Eriksson Midtbø and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. How to avoid a local epidemic becoming a global pandemic.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Solveig EngebretsenSAMBA, Norwegian Computing Center, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7064-0869
Alfonso Diz-Lois PalomaresDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-5381-9421
Gunnar RøDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Anja Bråthen KristoffersenDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-9622
Jonas Christoffer LindstrømDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3163-7552
Kenth Engø-MonsenTelenor Research, Fornebu, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1618-7597
Meghana KamineniOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology. University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6698-5151
Louis Yat Hin ChanDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4689-6995
Ørjan DaleTelenor Norge AS Fornebu, Norway.
Jørgen Eriksson MidtbøDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8321-2724
Kristian Lindalen StenerudTelenor Norge AS Fornebu, Norway.
Francesco Di RuscioDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Richard WhiteDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Arnoldo FrigessiOslo Centre for Biostatistics and Epidemiology. University of Oslo and Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Birgitte Freiesleben de BlasioDepartment of Method Development and Analytics. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4717-9805

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is challenging nations with devastating health and economic consequences. The spread of the disease has revealed major geographical heterogeneity because of regionally varying individual behaviour and mobility patterns, unequal meteorological conditions, diverse viral variants, and locally implemented non-pharmaceutical interventions and vaccination roll-out. To support national and regional authorities in surveilling and controlling the pandemic in real-time as it unfolds, we here develop a new regional mathematical and statistical model. The model, which has been in use in Norway during the first two years of the pandemic, is informed by real-time mobility estimates from mobile phone data and laboratory-confirmed case and hospitalisation incidence. To estimate regional and time-varying transmissibility, case detection probabilities, and missed imported cases, we developed a novel sequential Approximate Bayesian Computation method allowing inference in useful time, despite the high parametric dimension. We test our approach on Norway and find that three-week-ahead predictions are precise and well-calibrated, enabling policy-relevant situational awareness at a local scale. By comparing the reproduction numbers before and after lockdowns, we identify spatially heterogeneous patterns in their effect on the transmissibility, with a stronger effect in the most populated regions compared to the national reduction estimated to be 85% (95% CI 78%-89%). Our approach is the first regional changepoint stochastic metapopulation model capable of real time spatially refined surveillance and forecasting during emergencies.

Indexed as

COVID-19AwarenessBayes TheoremCommunicable Disease ControlForecastingHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID36689468
PMCPMC9894546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.