Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689260›Full record

ArticleJMIR cardio2023

Patient-Facing Clinical Decision Support for High Blood Pressure Control: Patient Survey.

David Dorr, Chris D'Autremont, Joshua E Richardson, Michelle Bobo, Christopher Terndrup, M J Dunne, Anthony Cheng, Robert Rope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR cardio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of patient decision aids for hypertension.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David DorrOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2318-7261
Chris D'AutremontOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8396-9794
Joshua E RichardsonRTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3066-2673
Michelle BoboOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-5593
Christopher TerndrupVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1196-8290
M J DunneOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2478-1510
Anthony ChengOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4911-5162
Robert RopeOregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5458-1379

Funding

Collaboration Oriented Approach to Controlling High blood pressure (COACH)R18HS028579 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DORR, DAVID A., KOOPMAN, RICHELLE J · 2022 to 2024
$3.0M
Translating Hypertension Guidelines into Practice: Development of Interoperable Clinical Decision SupportU18HS026849 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DORR, DAVID A. · 2019 to 2020
$939k
AHRQ HHS R18 HS028579AHRQ HHS U18 HS026849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh blood pressure (HBP) affects nearly half of adults in the United States and is a major factor in heart attacks, strokes, kidney disease, and other morbidities. To reduce risk, guidelines for HBP contain more than 70 recommendations, including many related to patient behaviors, such as home monitoring and lifestyle changes. Thus, the patient's role in controlling HBP is crucial. Patient-facing clinical decision support (CDS) tools may help patients adhere to evidence-based care, but customization is required.

objectiveOur objective was to understand how to adapt CDS to best engage patients in controlling HBP.

methodsWe conducted a mixed methods study with two phases: (1) survey-guided interviews with a limited cohort and (2) a nationwide web-based survey. Participation in each phase was limited to adults aged between 18 and 85 years who had been diagnosed with hypertension. The survey included general questions that assessed goal setting, treatment priorities, medication load, comorbid conditions, satisfaction with blood pressure (BP) management, and attitudes toward CDS, and also a series of questions regarding A/B preferences using paired information displays to assess perceived trustworthiness of potential CDS user interface options.

resultsWe conducted 17 survey-guided interviews to gather patient needs from CDS, then analyzed results and created a second survey of 519 adults with clinically diagnosed HBP. A large majority of participants reported that BP control was a high priority (83%), had monitored BP at home (82%), and felt comfortable using technology (88%). Survey respondents found displays with more detailed recommendations more trustworthy (56%-77% of them preferred simpler displays), especially when incorporating social trust and priorities from providers and patients like them, but had no differences in action taken.

conclusionsRespondents to the survey felt that CDS capabilities could help them with HBP control. The more detailed design options for BP display and recommendations messaging were considered the most trustworthy yet did not differentiate perceived actions.

Indexed as

blood pressure controlclinical decision supportdecision-making supporthigh blood pressurehypertensionpatient engagementpatient support toolshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID36689260
PMCPMC9903181

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.