Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689150›Full record

ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

The Oesophageal Cancer Multidisciplinary Team: Can Machine Learning Assist Decision-Making?

Navamayooran Thavanesan, Ganesh Vigneswaran, Indu Bodala, Timothy J Underwood

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association of multidisciplinary team management with survival in sinonasal malignancies: a real-world IPTW cohort study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Navamayooran ThavanesanSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK. N.Thavanesan@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7127-9606
Ganesh VigneswaranSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4115-428X
Indu BodalaSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7547-2526
Timothy J UnderwoodSchool of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, University Hospitals Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9455-2188
University of Southampton · GBSouthampton General Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe complexity of the upper gastrointestinal (UGI) multidisciplinary team (MDT) is continually growing, leading to rising clinician workload, time pressures, and demands. This increases heterogeneity or 'noise' within decision-making for patients with oesophageal cancer (OC) and may lead to inconsistent treatment decisions. In recent decades, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and more specifically the branch of machine learning (ML) has led to a paradigm shift in the perceived utility of statistical modelling within healthcare. Within oesophageal cancer (OC) care, ML techniques have already been applied with early success to the analyses of histological samples and radiology imaging; however, it has not yet been applied to the MDT itself where such models are likely to benefit from incorporating information-rich, diverse datasets to increase predictive model accuracy.

methodsThis review discusses the current role the MDT plays in modern UGI cancer care as well as the utilisation of ML techniques to date using histological and radiological data to predict treatment response, prognostication, nodal disease evaluation, and even resectability within OC.

resultsThe review finds that an emerging body of evidence is growing in support of ML tools within multiple domains relevant to decision-making within OC including automated histological analysis and radiomics. However, to date, no specific application has been directed to the MDT itself which routinely assimilates this information.

conclusionsThe authors feel the UGI MDT offers an information-rich, diverse array of data from which ML offers the potential to standardise, automate, and produce more consistent, data-driven MDT decisions.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEsophageal NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceClinical Decision-MakingHumansMachine LearningPatient Care TeamArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMultidisciplinary teamOesophageal cancer

Identifiers

PMID36689150
PMCPMC10073064
OpenAlexW4317778941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.