Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689127›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2023

Public support for safer supply programs: analysis of a cross-sectional survey of Canadians in two provinces.

Heather Morris, Hauwa Bwala, Jared Wesley, Elaine Hyshka

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perceived impacts of North Americas first de-medicalized safer supply program.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Heather MorrisFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8574-3644
Hauwa BwalaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1828-2520
Jared WesleyFaculty of Arts-Political Science Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0001-0060
Elaine HyshkaSchool of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. ehyshka@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5785-8890
University of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCanada's ongoing drug poisoning crisis has contributed to unprecedented rates of morbidity and mortality. Health Canada has funded safer supply pilot programs to help connect people who use drugs to pharmaceutical grade medications that reduce their reliance on a toxic drug supply. However, most provinces, including Alberta and Saskatchewan, have not endorsed these initiatives. We explored public support for safer supply programs in these two Canadian provinces and identified predictors of support for this policy option.

methodsCross-sectional data were examined from an online panel survey that included measures assessing views on policy responses to substance use and addiction. A total of 1602 adults were recruited during March 2021. We used descriptive statistics to characterize support for safer supply programs in Alberta and Saskatchewan and multinominal logistic regression analysis to examine predictors of public support for safer supply.

resultsThe majority of respondents (AB: 63.5% and SK: 56.3%) supported safer supply programs that replace illegal street drugs with pharmaceutical alternatives for those unable to stop using. Predicted probabilities show a greater probability of support for safer supply among those with higher education and those leaning left on the political spectrum.

conclusionA majority of Canadians from Alberta and Saskatchewan supported provincial government efforts to expand safer supply, suggesting a lack of public support is not the main barrier to implementation. Efforts at mobilizing this public opinion are needed to scale up and facilitate evaluation of this drug poisoning response.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAdultAlbertaCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPharmaceutical PreparationsSaskatchewanPharmaceutical PreparationsCross-sectional studyHarm reductionPublic opinionSafer supply

Identifiers

PMID36689127
PMCPMC9869824
OpenAlexW4317757473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.