Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689078›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Objective assessment of intraoperative skills for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Rui Farinha, Alberto Breda, James Porter, Alexandre Mottrie, Ben Van Cleynenbreugel, Jozef Vander Sloten, Angelo Mottaran, Anthony G Gallagher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Rui FarinhaOrsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium. ruifarinhaurologia@gmail.com.
Alberto BredaDepartment of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
James PorterSwedish Urology Group, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Alexandre MottrieOrsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium.
Ben Van CleynenbreugelDepartment of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Jozef Vander SlotenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Section of Biomechanics, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Angelo MottaranDivision of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaris di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Anthony G GallagherOrsi Academy, Proefhoevestraat 12, Melle, 9090, Ghent, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BEAzienda USL di Bologna · ITHospital de São José · PTOnze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital · BEORSI Academy · BESwedish Medical Center · USUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RAPN training usually takes place in-vivo and methods vary across countries/institutions. No common system exists to objectively assess trainee capacity to perform RAPN at predetermined performance levels prior to in-vivo practice. The identification of objective performance metrics for RAPN training is a crucial starting point to improve training and surgical outcomes. The authors sought to examine the reliability, construct and discriminative validity of objective intraoperative performance metrics which best characterize the optimal and suboptimal performance of a reference approach for training novice RAPN surgeons. Seven Novice and 9 Experienced RAPN surgeons video recorded one or two independently performed RAPN procedures in the human. The videos were anonymized and two experienced urology surgeons were trained to reliably score RAPN performance, using previously developed metrics. The assessors were blinded to the performing surgeon, hospital and surgeon group. They independently scored surgeon RAPN performance. Novice and Experienced group performance scores were compared for procedure steps completed and errors made. Each group was divided at the median for Total Errors score, and subgroup scores (i.e., Novice HiErrs and LoErrs, Experienced HiErrs and LoErrs) were compared. The mean inter-rater reliability (IRR) for scoring was 0.95 (range 0.84-1). Compared with Novices, Experienced RAPN surgeons made 69% fewer procedural Total Errors. This difference was accentuated when the LoErr Expert RAPN surgeon's performance was compared with the HiErrs Novice RAPN surgeon's performance with an observed 170% fewer Total Errors. GEARS showed poor reliability (Mean IRR = 0.44; range 0.0-0.8), for scoring RAPN surgical performance. The RAPN procedure metrics reliably distinguish Novice and Experienced surgeon performances. They further differentiated performance levels within a group with similar experiences. Reliable and valid metrics will underpin quality-assured novice RAPN surgical training.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgeonsClinical CompetenceHumansNephrectomyReproducibility of ResultsConstruct validationMetricsProficiency-based trainingRenal cancerRobot-assisted partial nephrectomySurgical training

Identifiers

PMID36689078
PMCPMC10374474
OpenAlexW4317759477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.