ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2023
Construction and validation of a bladder cancer risk model based on autophagy-related genes.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Time-Dependent Effects of Cisplatin on Autophagy Gene Expression in Bladder Cancer Cells.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- Multi-omics identification of a programmed cell death-related signature and potential target P4HB for bladder cancer based on a 101-combination machine learning and experimental validation.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Tumor Microenvironment Characterization IdentifiesHuman mutation · 2026Article
- Article
- A Novel Prognostic Signature Composed of Autophagy and Liver Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Comprehensive Analysis of Bulk and Single-Cell Transcriptomic Data.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- NR4A3 suppresses bladder cancer progression by modulating autophagyEuropean journal of histochemistry : EJH · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Autophagy has an important association with tumorigenesis, progression, and prognosis. However, the mechanism of autophagy-regulated genes on the risk prognosis of bladder cancer (BC) patients has not been fully elucidated yet. In this study, we created a prognostic model of BC risk based on autophagy-related genes, which further illustrates the value of genes associated with autophagy in the treatment of BC. We first downloaded human autophagy-associated genes and BC datasets from Human Autophagy Database and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, and finally obtained differential prognosis-associated genes for autophagy by univariate regression analysis and differential analysis of cancer versus normal tissues. Subsequently, we downloaded two datasets from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), GSE31684 and GSE15307, to expand the total number of samples. Based on these genes, we distinguished the molecular subtypes (C1, C2) and gene classes (A, B) of BC by consistent clustering analysis. Using the genes merged from TCGA and the two GEO datasets, we conducted least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate Cox regression analysis to obtain risk genes and construct autophagy-related risk prediction models. The accuracy of this risk prediction model was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and calibration curves, and then nomograms were constructed to predict the survival of bladder cancer patients at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. According to the median value of the risk score, we divided BC samples into the high- and low-risk groups. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was performed to compare survival differences between subgroups. Then, we used single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) for immune cell infiltration abundance, immune checkpoint genes, immunotherapy response, gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, and tumor mutation burden (TMB) analysis for different subgroups. We also applied quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) techniques to verify the expression of these six genes in the model. Finally, we chose the IMvigor210 dataset for external validation. Six risk genes associated with autophagy (SPOCD1, FKBP10, NAT8B, LDLR, STMN3, and ANXA2) were finally screened by LASSO regression algorithm and multivariate Cox regression analysis. ROC and calibration curves showed that the model established was accurate and reliable. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were used to verify that the risk model was an independent predictor. K-M survival analysis indicated that patients in the high-risk group had significantly worse overall survival than those in the low-risk group. Analysis by algorithms such as correlation analysis, gene set variation analysis (GSVA), and ssGSEA showed that differences in immune microenvironment, enrichment of multiple biologically active pathways, TMB, immune checkpoint genes, and human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) were observed in the different risk groups. Then, we constructed nomograms that predicted the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates of different BC patients. In addition, we screened nine sensitive chemotherapeutic drugs using the correlation between the obtained expression status of risk genes and drug sensitivity results. Finally, the external dataset IMvigor210 verified that the model is reliable and efficient. We established an autophagy-related risk prognostic model that is accurate and reliable, which lays the foundation for future personalized treatment of bladder cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.