Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689017›Full record

ArticleLasers in medical science2023

Repair bond strength of different CAD-CAM ceramics after various surface treatments combined with laser irradiation.

Seda Üstün Aladağ, Elif Aydoğan Ayaz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Lasers in medical science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Managing Fractured Ceramic Restorations: Current Evidence and Best Practices-A Scoping Review.Journal of esthetic and restorative dentistry : official publication of the American Academy of Esthetic Dentistry ... [et al.] · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Seda Üstün AladağDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Bursa Uludağ University, Bursa, Turkey.
Elif Aydoğan AyazDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. aydelif@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9577-5700
Bursa Uludağ Üni̇versi̇tesi̇ · TRKaradeniz Technical University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of different surface treatments combined with laser irradiation on the shear bond strength of different CAD-CAM ceramics to composite resin. A total of hundred forty-seven ceramic specimens with thicknesses of 2.5 mm were prepared from three different CAD-CAM ceramics (an yttrium oxide partially stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP); a zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic (ZLS); and a lithium disilicate-strengthened lithium aluminosilicate glass ceramic (LD-LAS)) and subjected to seven groups of treatment (n = 7): (1) control (no treatment), (2) Er:YAG laser irradiation, (3) Nd:YAG laser irradiation, (4) etching with hydrofluoric acid (HFA), (5) Er:YAG + HFA, (6) Nd:YAG + HFA, and (7) sandblasting. After surface treatment procedures, a ceramic primer (Clearfil Ceramic Primer Plus, Kuraray, Japan) was applied to the ceramics. Bonding agent (Single Bond Universal Adhesive, 3 M ESPE, USA) was then applied, and the composite resin (Estelite Sigma Quick, Kuraray, Japan) was layered on the ceramic surfaces. The shear bond strength test was performed using a universal testing machine at a load of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed by 2-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and the Bonferroni correction was used for pairwise comparisons (α = 0.05). Compared to the bond strength of the control group, irradiation by Er:YAG and Nd:YAG lasers alone improved the bond strength of the composite resin to the Y-TZP (P < 0.001) but did not change the bond strength of composite resin to the ZLS and LD-LAS (P > 0.05). Compared to the bond strength of the control group, etching with HFA alone increased the bond strength of the composite resin to the ZLS and LD-LAS (P < 0.001) but did not affect the bond strength of the composite resin to the Y-TZP (P > 0.05). The highest bond strength of ZLS was obtained using HFA + Er:YAG, and the highest bond strength for LD-LAS was obtained using HFA + Nd:YAG. It was concluded that Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser treatments presented the highest repair bond strength between the composite resin and Y-TZP ceramics. Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser treatments in conjuction with HFA presented the highest repair bond strength between the composite resin and the glassy ceramics, ZLS, and LD + LAS.

Indexed as

Dental BondingLithiumCeramicsComposite ResinsComputer-Aided DesignDental PorcelainLasersMaterials TestingResin CementsShear StrengthSurface PropertiesZirconiumComposite ResinsDental PorcelainLithiumResin CementsZirconiumzirconium oxideCAD-CAMCeramicsDental acid etchingEr:YAG laserNd:YAG laserShear strength

Identifiers

PMID36689017
OpenAlexW4317762394

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.