Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36689013›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical oncology2023

Repeated SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: induction of high-avidity anti-RBD neutralizing antibodies.

Teresita Caruso, Francesca Salani, Silvia Catanese, Federico Pratesi, Chiara Mercinelli, Giuseppe Motta, Virginia Genovesi, Adele Bonato, Galimberti Sara, Gianluca Masi and 1 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Teresita Caruso *Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Francesca Salani *Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Silvia CataneseDepartment of Translational Medicine and New Technologies for Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Federico PratesiClinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7226-0907
Chiara MercinelliOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Giuseppe MottaClinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Virginia GenovesiOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Adele BonatoOncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.
Galimberti SaraHematology Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Gianluca MasiDepartment of Translational Medicine and New Technologies for Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Paola MiglioriniClinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma, 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy. paola.migliorini@unipi.it.
University of Pisa · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana · ITScuola Superiore Sant'Anna · IT

Funding

Ministero della Salute COVID-2020-12371849
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer patients are more vulnerable to COVID-19 and are thus given high priority in vaccination campaigns. In solid cancer patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors, we evaluated the amount of anti-RBD and neutralizing antibodies and antibody avidity after two or three doses of the vaccine.

methodsThirty-eight solid cancer patients, 15 untreated hematological patients and 21 healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Blood was collected before the first dose (T0), 21 days after the second (T2) and in 18 solid cancer patients also 15 days after the third dose of vaccine (T3). IgG, IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were detected by ELISA. Neutralizing antibodies were measured testing the inhibition of RBD binding to ACE2. Antibody avidity was evaluated in 18 patients by a urea avidity ELISA.

resultsIgG anti-RBD antibodies were produced in 65.8% of the cancer patients at T2, and in 60% of hematological patients at levels lower than healthy controls. IgM and IgA anti-RBD antibodies were also produced in 5.3% and 21% cancer patients, respectively. At T3, a significant increase in anti-RBD IgG levels was observed. Neutralizing antibodies were produced in 68.4% of cancer patients as compared with 93% of untreated hematological patients and 100% of controls, at titers lower than in healthy subjects. At T3, neutralizing antibodies and avidity of IgG anti-RBD increased; 6/18 patients negative at T2 developed neutralizing antibodies at T3.

conclusionThe data indicate that in cancer patients mRNA vaccine induces high avidity anti-RBD antibodies and neutralizing antibodies that increase after the third dose. The process of induction and selection of high-affinity antibodies is apparently unaffected by the treatment with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibodies.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MSARS-CoV-2VaccinationAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GImmunoglobulin MAntibody avidityAnti-Spike antibodiesImmune Checkpoint inhibitorsMRNA vaccineNeutralizing antibodiesSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID36689013
PMCPMC9869844
OpenAlexW4317778970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.