ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2023
Posterior cervical spinal fusion in the pediatric population using modern adult instrumentation - clinical outcome and safety.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomy Analysis of C5 CT Images in Children Aged 1-14 Years.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Posterior cervical-thoracic spinal fixation using mandibular instrumentation to treat acute cervical spine traumatic instability in the young pediatric population.Spinal cord series and cases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraditionally, less rigid fixation techniques have been applied to the pediatric cervical spine. There is a lack of long-term outcome data for rigid fixation techniques. The purpose of this study was to define the clinical outcome and safety of posterior instrumented fusion in the pediatric population using adult posterior instrumentation.
methodsA multicenter, retrospective review of pediatric patients who underwent posterior cervical fusion using a 3.5 mm posterior cervical system for any indication was performed. Outcome parameters included complications, revision and fusion rates, operative time (OR), blood loss, and postoperative neurologic status. Outcomes were compared between patient groups (posterior only versus anterior/posterior approach, short versus intermediate versus long fusion, and between different etiologies) using Mann-Whitney and chi-square test.
resultsSeventy-nine patients with a mean age of 9.9 years and mean follow-up of 2.8 years were included. At baseline 44 (56%) had an abnormal neurologic exam. Congenital deformities and basilar invagination were the most common indications for surgery. Posterior-only surgery was performed in 71 (90%) cases; mean number of levels fused was 4 (range 1-15). Overall, 4 (5%) operative complications and 4 (5%) revisions were reported at an average postoperative time of 2.6 years. Neurologic status remained unchanged in 74%, improved in 23%, and worsened in 3%. When comparing outcome measures between the various groups, 2 significant differences were found: OR was longer in the anterior/posterior approach group and decline of neuro status was more frequent in the long fusion group.
conclusionPosterior cervical fusion with an adult 3.5 mm posterior cervical system was safe in this cohort of 79 pediatric patients irrespective of surgical technique, fusion length, and etiology, resulting in a high fusion and low complication/revision rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.