Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688993›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2023

Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is associated with a lower risk of type 2 diabetes: the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort.

Fie Langmann, Daniel B Ibsen, Anne Tjønneland, Anja Olsen, Kim Overvad, Christina C Dahm

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nutrition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Associations between the EAT-Lancet planetary health diet and incident dementia.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fie LangmannDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3474-9346
Daniel B IbsenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7038-4770
Anne TjønnelandDanish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4385-2097
Anja OlsenDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-503X
Kim OvervadDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6429-7921
Christina C DahmDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. ccd@ph.au.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0481-2893
Aarhus University · DKUniversity of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

Danmarks Frie Forskningsfond 1057-00016B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeType 2 diabetes is a global health problem. While a healthy diet lowers risk of type 2 diabetes, less is known about diets with low climate impact. This study aimed to investigate adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and risk of type 2 diabetes in a Danish setting.

methodsIn the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health cohort, dietary data were collected using a validated 192-item food frequency questionnaire, at recruitment in 1993-1997. In total, 54,232 participants aged 50-64 years at baseline with no previous cancer or diabetes diagnoses were included in the current analyses. The EAT-Lancet diet score was used to assess adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet. Participants scored 0 (non-adherence) or 1 (adherence) point for each of the 14 dietary components of the diet score (range 0-14 points). Participants were followed through register linkage until type 2 diabetes diagnosis or censoring. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using multivariable-adjusted Cox regression models.

resultsDuring a median 15-year follow-up period, 7130 participants developed type 2 diabetes. The hazard ratio for developing type 2 diabetes was 0.78 (95% CI 0.71; 0.86) for those with highest EAT-Lancet diet scores (11-14 points) compared to those with lowest scores (0-7 points) after adjusting for potential confounders. After further adjusting for potential mediators, including BMI, the corresponding hazard ratio was 0.83 (95% CI 0.76; 0.92).

conclusionGreater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet was associated with a lower risk of developing type 2 diabetes in a middle-aged Danish population.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2NeoplasmsDenmarkDietDiet, HealthyHumansMiddle AgedRisk FactorsCohort studyEAT-Lancet dietEpidemiologySustainable dietary patternsType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36688993
OpenAlexW4317780098

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.