ArticleEuropean radiology2023
Ultralow-dose [
Article in European radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of scan time on dynamic [Formula: see text]-FAPI-04 total-body PET parametric imaging generated by deep learning models.EJNMMI physics · 2026Article
- Total-bodyEJNMMI research · 2025Article
- Ultra-low dose imaging in a standard axial field-of-view PET.EJNMMI reports · 2025Article
- Impact of deep learning denoising on kinetic modelling for low-dose dynamic PET: application to single- and dual-tracer imaging protocols.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Low dose optimization for total-body 2-[European radiology · 2025Article
- The impact of long axial field of view (LAFOV) PET on oncologic imaging.European journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Expert consensus on workflow of PET/CT with long axial field-of-view.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Review
- Lung ultrasound score as a tool to assess pulmonary ventilation and disease severity in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.American journal of translational research · 2025Article
- Hybrid PET/MRI of large vessel vasculitis : Radiation dose compared to PET/CT with view on cumulative effective dose.Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2024Article
- Dose Reduction in Pediatric Oncology Patients with Delayed Total-Body [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- Establishment and Application of a Radiation Dose Rate Model for Nuclear Medicine Examinees.China CDC weekly · 2024Article
- Quantitation of dynamic total-body PET imaging: recent developments and future perspectives.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesValidation of [
methodsThis prospective head-to-head intraindividual study compared dynamic and static parameters of ultralow-dose with half-dose [
resultsThirty participants were included in this study, and in terms of kinetic indicators, no special differences were found between the two groups of normal organs and lesions. In static images, those in groups ULD8 and LD2 achieved scores of [Formula: see text] 3.0, meeting the requirements for clinical diagnosis. In static imaging, four lesions were missed in the LD1 group with a lesion detectability of 89.7% (35/39). In the meantime, lesions were not missed in the whole ultra-low dose group (ULD5, ULD8, ULD10, and ULD15) and half-dose groups (LD2 and LD3).
conclusionsCompared with half-dose imaging, ultralow-dose [
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2000036487 KEY POINTS: • A prospective single-center study showed that the total-body PET scanner allows ultralow-dose [
Indexed as
Identifiers
36688971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.