Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688922›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Considerations for Drug Development in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Mikkael A Sekeres, Nina Kim, Amy E DeZern, Kelly J Norsworthy, Jacqueline S Garcia, R Angelo de Claro, Marc R Theoret, Emily Y Jen, Lori A Ehrlich, Amer M Zeidan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Are We Ready For "Triplet" Therapy in Higher-Risk MDS?Clinical hematology international · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mikkael A SekeresDivision of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami, Miami, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-2009-6524
Nina KimNCI, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-1809-0417
Amy E DeZernJohns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5225-4609
Kelly J NorsworthyCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0002-8462-9994
Jacqueline S GarciaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2118-6302
R Angelo de ClaroCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-8362-1977
Marc R TheoretOncology Center of Excellence, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-4973-5297
Emily Y JenCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0003-1962-5708
Lori A EhrlichCenter for Drug Evaluation and Research, FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-5981-1332
Amer M Zeidan *Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, and Yale Cancer Center, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.ORCID 0000-0001-7017-8160
Rami S Komrokji *H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-1876-5269

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Intramural FDA HHS FD999999NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have historically been challenging diseases for drug development due to their biology, preclinical modeling, and the affected patient population. In April 2022, the FDA convened a panel of regulators and academic experts in MDS to discuss approaches to improve MDS drug development. The panel reviewed challenges in MDS clinical trial design and endpoints and outlined considerations for future trial design in MDS to facilitate drug development to meaningfully meet patient needs. Challenges for defining clinical benefit in patients with MDS include cumbersome response criteria, standardized transfusion thresholds, and application and validation of patient reported outcome instruments. Clinical trials should reflect the biology of disease evolution, the advanced age of patients with MDS, and how patients are treated in real-world settings to maximize the likelihood of identifying active drugs. In patients with lower-risk disease, response criteria for anemic patients should be based on baseline transfusion dependency, improvement in symptoms, and quality of life. For higher-risk patients with MDS, trials should include guidance to prevent dose reductions or delays that could limit efficacy, specify minimal durations of treatment (in the absence of toxicity or progression), and have endpoints focused on overall survival and durable responses. MDS trials should be designed from the outset to allow the practicable application of new therapies in this high-needs population, with drugs that can be administered and tolerated in community settings, and with endpoints that meaningfully improve patients' lives over existing therapies.

Indexed as

Myelodysplastic SyndromesQuality of LifeHumans

Identifiers

PMID36688922
PMCPMC10349686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.