Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688865›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England2024

The increasing burden of the 2-week wait colorectal cancer pathway in a single centre: the impact of faecal immunochemical tests.

N Farkas, J W O'Brien, L Palyvos, W Maclean, S Benton, T Rockall, I Jourdan

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07430527 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Retrospective Review of the Secondary-care Colorectal Cancer Pathway Within NHS Lothian: An Evaluation of 3 Years of Pathway Performance

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2026 to 2030Enrolled25,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer (Diagnosis)ArmsFaecal Immunohistochemical test
NCT07430540 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Optimising Patient Pathways for Earlier Detection of Colorectal Cancer in Secondary Care: Implementation of Multiple FIT Testing

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2026 to 2037Enrolled1,000ConditionsColorectal Cancer, Significant Bowel PathologyArmsAdditional FIT testing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

N FarkasRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4216-4786
J W O'BrienRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
L PalyvosRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
W MacleanRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0336-6839
S BentonRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9230-9088
T RockallRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
I JourdanRoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTwo-week wait (TWW) volume and colorectal cancer (CRC) detection pose an increasing challenge for NHS cancer services. Primary aims were to assess the introduction of faecal immunochemical tests (FIT) into clinical practice at our centre, the impact on TWW referral volume and CRC diagnoses, and to provide an update to previously published work. A secondary aim was to correlate FIT value and investigation.

methodsTWW CRC data following incorporation of FIT into clinical practice were analysed (1 June 2019-31 July 2021). Parameters assessed were monthly referral volume, CRC detection, primary care FIT volume and secondary care investigations. Referrals and CRC detection rates were compared with previously published data (2009-2019). Data relating to primary care FIT were collated from Berkshire and Surrey Pathology Services.

resultsTWW referrals increased 360% (2009-2020). CRC incidence decreased from 8.87% to 3.24%. Following incorporation into clinical practice, primary care FIT requests have increased to >450/month and accompanied 1,722/4,796 referrals. CRC incidence is static (3-4%). Patients with FIT <10µg Hb/g faeces undergo radiological imaging more commonly, whereas FIT-positive patients are more likely to undergo endoscopy, although the difference is not statistically significant.

conclusionsNo significant change in CRC diagnosis was observed, despite increasing TWW referrals. Increasing utilisation of FIT in both primary and secondary care has helped maintain CRC detection while avoiding diagnostic delay. This study supports growing evidence highlighting the value of FIT in triage, referral and TWW investigation. FIT appears increasingly important for allocating secondary care resources (endoscopy), while guiding primary care referral. Additional low-cost strategies to determine prioritisation or reassurance (e.g. repeat FIT) require further evaluation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsColonoscopyDelayed DiagnosisEarly Detection of CancerFecesHemoglobinsHumansSensitivity and SpecificityHemoglobinsColonoscopyColorectal cancerEndoscopyTwo-week pathway

Identifiers

PMID36688865
PMCPMC10981981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.