Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688736›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Protocol for an integrative review: patient and families' perspectives on telehealth in palliative care.

Eithne Hayes Bauer, Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz, Frans Brandt, Anthony C Smith, Georg Bollig, Karin Brochstedt Dieperink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Eithne Hayes BauerResearch Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland Sonderborg Branch, Aabenraa, Denmark ehb@rsyd.dk.ORCID 0000-0002-2195-5311
Anders Nikolai Ørsted SchultzInternal Medicine Research Unit, Sygehus Sønderjylland, Aabenraa, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1908-6428
Frans BrandtResearch Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland Sonderborg Branch, Aabenraa, Denmark.
Anthony C SmithCentre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7756-5136
Georg BolligDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, Helios Klinikum, Schleswig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0367-5295
Karin Brochstedt DieperinkDepartment of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-4766-3242
Sygehus Sønderjylland · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DKHelios Vogtland Klinikum Plauen · DEThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIncreases in the use of telehealth in palliative care (telepalliative care) prior to, and during, the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a proliferation of studies on the topic. While knowledge is building on how providers and recipients adapt to telepalliative care, no reviews have, as of yet, examined telepalliative care from a patient and family perspective. Therefore, the aim of this integrative review is to explore patients and families' perspectives on telepalliative. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An integrative review will be performed inspired by the methodology of Remmington and Toronto from March 2022 to December 2022. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL will be searched for primary peer-reviewed studies that describe telepalliative care from patient and families' perspectives. Limiters will be used for age; 18 years+, time; 10 years, and language; English and Danish. Hand searches of authors of included articles and reference lists of included articles will be performed. Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise selected articles using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Conflicts will be resolved through discussions with a third reviewer. Data will be extracted independently by two reviewers into a data matrix with predefined headings and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings will be reported thematically, summarised into a thematic synthesis and discussed in relation to relevant literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required for this review. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant international conference. Reporting of this protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol checklist and prospectively reported to PROSPERO (CRD42022301206).

Indexed as

COVID-19Hospice and Palliative Care NursingTelemedicineHumansPalliative CarePandemicsResearch DesignReview Literature as TopicAdult palliative careOrganisation of health servicesTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID36688736
PMCPMC9454006
OpenAlexW4295014426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.