SynthesisJournal of the National Cancer Institute2023
Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
34 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Big Data and Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Drug Discovery: Promise, Challenges, and Emerging Opportunities.Cancers · 2026Review
- When Cancer Research Met Artificial Intelligence: From Machine Learning to Intelligent Oncology.Cancers · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a large language model-based, retrieval-augmented generation application for query response in early oncology clinical trials.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- AI-based augmentation of oncology clinical trials.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2026Review
- Development of a clinical trial knowledge management application for community oncology.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Detecting and Mitigating Bias for Inclusive and Trustworthy Clinical Research: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation. Genomic and precision medicine · 2026Review
- Sequencing AI Automation and Data Interoperability in Oncology Using a Scenario-Planning Framework Coupled With Discrete-Event Simulation: Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Article
- The role of AI in oncology: present applications and future horizons.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence for clinical trial design, conduct, and analysis: a narrative review.ESMO real world data and digital oncology · 2026Review
- The impact of AI on modern oncology from early detection to personalized cancer treatment.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Early assessment of myocardial injury in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 using a two-stage deep learning framework based on non-contrast chest computed tomography.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Article
- Improving Recruitment Into Research Studies via Electronically Collected Patient-Entered Data: Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing gastrointestinal cancer research with artificial intelligence: From precision patient stratification to real-world evidence.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Review
- Review
- Application of Machine Learning for Predicting Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) for cancer clinical trial enrollment and its predictive accuracy in identifying eligible patients for inclusion in such trials.
methodsDatabases of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched until June 2022. Articles were included if they reported on AI actively being used in the clinical trial enrollment process. Narrative synthesis was conducted among all extracted data: accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. For studies where the 2x2 contingency table could be calculated or supplied by authors, a meta-analysis to calculate summary statistics was conducted using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristics curve model.
resultsTen articles reporting on more than 50 000 patients in 19 datasets were included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity exceeded 80% in all but 1 dataset. Positive predictive value exceeded 80% in 5 of 17 datasets. Negative predictive value exceeded 80% in all datasets. Summary sensitivity was 90.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 70.9% to 97.4%); summary specificity was 99.3% (95% CI = 81.8% to 99.9%).
conclusionsAI demonstrated comparable, if not superior, performance to manual screening for patient enrollment into cancer clinical trials. As well, AI is highly efficient, requiring less time and human resources to screen patients. AI should be further investigated and implemented for patient recruitment into cancer clinical trials. Future research should validate the use of AI for clinical trials enrollment in less resource-rich regions and ensure broad inclusion for generalizability to all sexes, ages, and ethnicities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.