Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688676›Full record

ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2023

Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza H5N1 Virus Infections in Wild Red Foxes (Vulpes vulpes) Show Neurotropism and Adaptive Virus Mutations.

Luca Bordes, Sandra Vreman, Rene Heutink, Marit Roose, Sandra Venema, Sylvia B E Pritz-Verschuren, Jolianne M Rijks, José L Gonzales, Evelien A Germeraad, Marc Engelsma and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
24.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca BordesWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6958-7925
Sandra VremanWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Rene HeutinkWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Marit RooseWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Sandra VenemaWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Sylvia B E Pritz-VerschurenWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Jolianne M RijksDutch Wildlife Health Centre, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
José L GonzalesWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-5380
Evelien A GermeraadWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Marc EngelsmaWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.
Nancy BeerensWageningen Bioveterinary Research, Lelystad, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6756-4431
Wageningen University & Research · NLUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the 2020 to 2022 epizootic of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAI), several infections of mammalian species were reported in Europe. In the Netherlands, HPAI H5N1 virus infections were detected in three wild red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) that were submitted with neurological symptoms between December of 2021 and February of 2022. A histopathological analysis demonstrated that the virus was mainly present in the brain, with limited or no detection in the respiratory tract or other organs. Limited or no virus shedding was observed in throat and rectal swabs. A phylogenetic analysis showed that the three fox viruses were not closely related, but they were related to HPAI H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b viruses that are found in wild birds. This suggests that the virus was not transmitted between the foxes. A genetic analysis demonstrated the presence of the mammalian adaptation E627K in the polymerase basic two (PB2) protein of the two fox viruses. In both foxes, the avian (PB2-627E) and the mammalian (PB2-627K) variants were present as a mixture in the virus population, which suggests that the mutation emerged in these specific animals. The two variant viruses were isolated, and virus replication and passaging experiments were performed. These experiments showed that the mutation PB2-627K increases the replication of the virus in mammalian cell lines, compared to the chicken cell line, and at the lower temperatures of the mammalian upper respiratory tract. This study showed that the HPAI H5N1 virus is capable of adaptation to mammals; however, more adaptive mutations are required to allow for efficient transmission between mammals. Therefore, surveillance in mammals should be expanded to closely monitor the emergence of zoonotic mutations for pandemic preparedness.

Indexed as

FoxesInfluenza A Virus, H5N1 SubtypeOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsAnimalsAnimals, WildMutationPharynxPhylogenyViral TropismfoxHPAI H5N1neurotropismvirologyzoonotic infections

Identifiers

PMID36688676
PMCPMC9927208
OpenAlexW4317752002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.