ReviewBiomaterials science2023
Harnessing the potential of oxygen-generating materials and their utilization in organ-specific delivery of oxygen.
Review in Biomaterials science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Engineering the oxygen microenvironment for pancreatic islet transplants.NPJ Regenerative medicine · 2026Review
- Oxygen-releasing scaffolds in tissue engineering: design strategies, fabrication and regenerative applications.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
- Emerging nanomaterials capable of effectively facilitating osteoblast maturation.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Stem Cells in Bone Tissue Engineering: Progress, Promises and Challenges.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2024Review
- Development of a Sprayable Hydrogel-Based Wound Dressing: An In Vitro Model.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Decellularized extracellular matrix-based composite scaffolds for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.Regenerative biomaterials · 2024Review
- Scaffolds with high oxygen content support osteogenic cell survival under hypoxia.Biomaterials science · 2023Article
- Hydrogel-Impregnated Self-Oxygenating Electrospun Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The limited availability of transplantable organs hinders the success of patient treatment through organ transplantation. In addition, there are challenges with immune rejection and the risk of disease transmission when receiving organs from other individuals. Tissue engineering aims to overcome these challenges by generating functional three-dimensional (3D) tissue constructs. When developing tissues or organs of a particular shape, structure, and size as determined by the specific needs of the therapeutic intervention, a tissue specific oxygen supply to all parts of the tissue construct is an utmost requirement. Moreover, the lack of a functional vasculature in engineered tissues decreases cell survival upon implantation in the body. Oxygen-generating materials can alleviate this challenge in engineered tissue constructs by providing oxygen in a sustained and controlled manner. Oxygen-generating materials can be incorporated into 3D scaffolds allowing the cells to receive and utilize oxygen efficiently. In this review, we present an overview of the use of oxygen-generating materials in various tissue engineering applications in an organ specific manner as well as their potential use in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.