Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688468›Full record

ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2023

A process for converting an in-person training to increase church capacity to implement physical activity and healthy eating practices and policies to an online format.

Sara Wilcox, Ruth P Saunders, Jessica Stucker, Andrew T Kaczynski, Kelsey R Day, Deborah Kinnard, Lindsay Decker, John A Bernhart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sara WilcoxPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4992-4610
Ruth P SaundersPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Jessica StuckerPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Andrew T KaczynskiPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Kelsey R DayPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Deborah KinnardPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
Lindsay DeckerPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.
John A BernhartPrevention Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6710-4195

Funding

USC PRC Center and Core Research Project: National Implementation Study of the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition (FAN) ProgramU48DP006401 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2018 to 2023
$8.0M
Faith, Activity, and Nutrition: Dissemination in Underserved CommunitiesU48DP005000 · DP · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA AT COLUMBIA · PI WILCOX, SARA · 2014 to 2019
$5.9M
NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP005000NCCDPHP CDC HHS U48 DP006401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of evidence-based public health programs into practice is critical for improving health, but trainings for organizational change agents are often not scalable. To describe the process of converting a training that targets faith-based organizational capacity development from an in-person to an online format. We engaged in an iterative process to convert the training delivery mode from in-person to online that included assessing stakeholder support, consulting the literature on best practices, seeking a design team, consolidating content, designing engaging lessons, and building an online site. Feedback from end-users and other audiences was incorporated throughout. Pilot participants with characteristics like intended training users were then recruited via community and faith-based partner networks. They rated their agreement with statements about the effectiveness as well as design and functionality of each lesson and the overall training (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and participated in a structured follow-up interview. Nine pilot participants (representing 9 churches in 7 states; 6 African American, 5 with health ministries) rated the online lessons favorably (all ratings ≥ 4.5). Most (90.4%) perceived the lesson duration to be "just right" and spent 52.5 ± 9.9 minutes/lesson. Participants evaluated the overall training positively (all ratings ≥ 4.7). Lesson content, resources, multimedia, and program ideas were most-liked aspects of lessons, while content, staff responsiveness, discussion board, and pace were most-liked aspects of the overall training in open-ended and interview responses. This paper shares a replicable process for converting training modalities from in-person to online with the goal of increased scalability.

Indexed as

Diet, HealthyHealth PromotionExerciseHumansPolicyPublic HealthFaith-basedImplementationNutritionOnline trainingPhysical activityTranslation

Identifiers

PMID36688468
PMCPMC10105879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.