ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2023
A process for converting an in-person training to increase church capacity to implement physical activity and healthy eating practices and policies to an online format.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation costs and relationships between costs and outcomes in the Faith, Activity, and Nutrition program: a church-based intervention.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Transitioning from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to the updated CFIR for quantitative measurement of influences on implementation outcomes in a faith-based walking intervention.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
- Implementation outcomes and associated constructs from the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research among churches trained online to implement Faith, Activity, and Nutrition in a national implementation study.Translational behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The implementation of evidence-based public health programs into practice is critical for improving health, but trainings for organizational change agents are often not scalable. To describe the process of converting a training that targets faith-based organizational capacity development from an in-person to an online format. We engaged in an iterative process to convert the training delivery mode from in-person to online that included assessing stakeholder support, consulting the literature on best practices, seeking a design team, consolidating content, designing engaging lessons, and building an online site. Feedback from end-users and other audiences was incorporated throughout. Pilot participants with characteristics like intended training users were then recruited via community and faith-based partner networks. They rated their agreement with statements about the effectiveness as well as design and functionality of each lesson and the overall training (1 = strongly disagree, 5 = strongly agree) and participated in a structured follow-up interview. Nine pilot participants (representing 9 churches in 7 states; 6 African American, 5 with health ministries) rated the online lessons favorably (all ratings ≥ 4.5). Most (90.4%) perceived the lesson duration to be "just right" and spent 52.5 ± 9.9 minutes/lesson. Participants evaluated the overall training positively (all ratings ≥ 4.7). Lesson content, resources, multimedia, and program ideas were most-liked aspects of lessons, while content, staff responsiveness, discussion board, and pace were most-liked aspects of the overall training in open-ended and interview responses. This paper shares a replicable process for converting training modalities from in-person to online with the goal of increased scalability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.