Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688222›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2023

Oppositional Cat Swarm Optimization-Based Feature Selection Approach for Credit Card Fraud Detection.

N Prabhakaran, R Nedunchelian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

N PrabhakaranDepartment of Computer Applications, Presidency College, Bangalore, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9024-1040
R NedunchelianDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Excel Engineering College, Namakkal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7819-4314

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Credit card fraud has drastically increased in recent times due to the advancements in e-commerce systems and communication technology. Falsified credit card transactions affect the financial status of the companies as well as clients regularly and fraudsters incessantly try to develop new approaches to commit frauds. The recognition of credit card fraud is essential to sustain the trustworthiness of e-payments. Therefore, it is highly needed to design effective and accurate credit card fraud detection (CCFD) techniques. The recently developed machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) can be employed for CCFD because of the characteristics of building an effective model to identify fraudulent transactions. In this view, this study presents a novel oppositional cat swarm optimization-based feature selection model with a deep learning model for CCFD, called the OCSODL-CCFD technique. The major intention of the OCSODL-CCFD technique is to detect and classify fraudulent transactions using credit cards. The OCSODL-CCFD technique derives a new OCSO-based feature selection algorithm to choose an optimal subset of features. Besides, the chaotic krill herd algorithm (CKHA) with the bidirectional gated recurrent unit (BiGRU) model is applied for the classification of credit card frauds, in which the hyperparameter tuning of the BiGRU model is performed using the CKHA. To demonstrate the supreme outcomes of the OCSODL-CCFD model, a wide range of simulation analyses were carried out. The extensive comparative analysis highlighted the better outcomes of the OCSODL-CCFD model over the compared ones based on several evaluation metrics.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsFraudCommerceMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36688222
PMCPMC9859705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.