Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688150›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

Morphologic brain network predicts levodopa responsiveness in Parkinson disease.

Yongsheng Xie, Chunyan Gao, Bin Wu, Liling Peng, Jianjun Wu, Liqin Lang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Comparison betweenQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Yongsheng XieDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Chunyan GaoDepartment of Nursing, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Bin WuDepartment of Neurology and National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liling PengShanghai Universal Medical Imaging Diagnostic Center, Shanghai, China.
Jianjun WuDepartment of Neurology and National Clinical Research Center for Aging and Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Liqin LangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Fudan University · CNShanghai Center for Brain Science and Brain-Inspired Technology · CNShanghai Medical Information Center · CNState Key Laboratory of Medical Neurobiology

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The levodopa challenge test (LCT) has been routinely used in Parkinson disease (PD) evaluation and predicts the outcome of deep brain stimulation (DBS). Guidelines recommend that patients with an improvement in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)-III score > 33% in the LCT receive DBS treatment. However, LCT results are affected by many factors, and only provide information on the immediate effectiveness of dopamine. The aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between LCT outcome and brain imaging features of PD patients to determine whether the latter can be used to identify candidates for DBS. Methods: A total of 38 PD patients were enrolled in the study. Based on improvement in UPDRS-III score in the LCT, patients were divided into low improvement (PD-LCT-L) and high improvement (PD-LCT-H) groups. Each patient's neural network was reconstructed based on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data using the Jensen-Shannon divergence similarity estimation method. The network was established with the multiple kernel support vector machine technique. We analyzed differences in individual morphologic brain networks and their global and local metrics to determine whether there were differences in the connectomes of PD-LCT-L and PD-LCT-H groups. Results: The 2 groups were similar in terms of demographic and clinical characteristics. Mean ± SD levodopa responsiveness was 26.52% ± 3.47% in the PD-LCT-L group (N = 13) and 58.66% ± 4.09% in the PD-LCT-H group ( Conclusion: Morphologic brain network assessment is a valuable method for predicting levodopa responsiveness in PD patients, which can facilitate the selection of candidates for DBS.

Indexed as

connectomedeep brain stimulationLevodopa challenge testmorphologic brain networkParkinson disease

Identifiers

PMID36688150
PMCPMC9849367
OpenAlexW4313576203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.