Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688094›Full record

ArticleArthroplasty today2023

Achieving Target Cemented Femoral Stem Anteversion Using a 3-Dimensional Model.

Paul Rebgetz, Tom McCarthy, Hamish McLaren, Matthew J Wilson, Sarah L Whitehouse, Ross W Crawford

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthroplasty today, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quantifying the anatomical variability of the proximal femur.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Paul RebgetzOrthopaedic Research Unit, School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Tom McCarthyStryker Corporation, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Hamish McLarenOrthopaedic Research Unit, School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Matthew J WilsonExeter Hip Unit, Princess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre, Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, Devon, UK.
Sarah L WhitehouseOrthopaedic Research Unit, School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Ross W CrawfordOrthopaedic Research Unit, School of Mechanical, Medical & Process Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Queensland University of Technology, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, Queensland, Australia.
Queensland University of Technology · AUPrincess Elizabeth Orthopaedic Centre · GBStryker (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Total hip arthroplasty aims to provide patients with a pain-free and stable hip joint through optimization of biomechanics such as femoral anteversion. There are studies evaluating the limits of cementless stem version, however, none assessing the range of version achieved by a cemented collarless stem. A computed tomography (CT)-based study was performed, utilizing a contemporary robotic planning platform to assess the amount of rotation afforded by a cemented collarless stem, whilst maintaining native biomechanics. Methods: The study utilized 36 cadaveric hips. All had CT scans of the pelvis and hip joints. The CT scans were then loaded into a contemporary robotic planning platform. A stem that restored the patients native femoral offset was selected and positioned in the virtual femur. The stem was rotated while checking for cortical contact at the level of the neck cut. Cortical contact was regarded as the rotation limit, assessed in both anteversion and retroversion. Target range for stem anteversion was 10°-20°. Failure to achieve target version triggered a sequence of adjustments to simulate surgical decisions. Results: Native femoral offset and target version range was obtained in 29 of 36 (80.5%) cases. Following an adjustment sequence, 4 further stems achieved target anteversion with a compromise in offset of 2.3 mm. Overall 33 of 36 (91.7%) stems achieved the target anteversion range of 10°-20°. Conclusions: Target femoral stem anteversion can be achieved using a cemented, collarless stem in a CT-based 3-dimensional model in 80.5% of hips. With a small compromise in offset (mean 2.3 mm), this can be increased to 91.7%.

Indexed as

Cemented collarless stemFemoral anteversionRobotics

Identifiers

PMID36688094
PMCPMC9852927
OpenAlexW4316135948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.