Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36688080›Full record

ArticleJournal of the World Aquaculture Society2018

Design and Cost Analysis of a Self-contained Mobile Laboratory for Commercial-scale Aquatic Species Cryopreservation.

William M Childress, Rex H Caffey, Terrence R Tiersch

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Simulation analysis of high-throughput oyster cryopreservation at three scales of production.Aquaculture international : journal of the European Aquaculture Society · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cryopreservation ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A generalized approach for sperm cryopreservation in the genusJournal of the World Aquaculture Society · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

William M ChildressAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820 USA.
Rex H CaffeyCenter for Natural Resource Economics and Policy, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70803, USA.
Terrence R TierschAquatic Germplasm and Genetic Resources Center, School of Renewable Natural Resources, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70820 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7738-1978
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center · US

Funding

Enhanced Development of the Xiphophorus Model System R24-OD-011120R24OD011120 · OD · TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI WALTER, RONALD B · 2012 to 2019
$5.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24OD010441 · OD · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI BLACKBURN, HARVEY D., MONROE, WILLIAM · 2012 to 2021
$4.3M
Development of Germplasm Resources for Preservation of Aquatic ModelsR24RR023998 · NCRR · LOUISIANA STATE UNIV AGRICULTURAL CENTER · PI TIERSCH, TERRENCE ROBERT · 2008 to 2011
$2.3M
NCRR NIH HHS R24 RR023998NIH HHS R24 OD010441NIH HHS R24 OD011120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although aquatic species cryopreservation protocols have been studied around the world over the past 60 yr., germplasm repository development efforts and commercialization have begun only recently. The goal of this project was to develop a self-contained mobile laboratory for on-site high-throughput cryopreservation of aquatic species. The objectives of this study were to: (1) identify how a mobile laboratory would function in different operational scenarios, (2) customize an enclosed cargo trailer to function as a mobile laboratory, (3) evaluate the laboratory layout and ability of cryopreservation equipment to operate from generator power, and (4) document the investment costs for private and public groups to integrate a mobile laboratory into an existing cryopreservation facility at three levels of automation and estimate the total cost per trip based on hypothetical assumptions for two scenarios (aquaculture production and repository development). There were three operational designs identified for the mobile laboratory: (1) self-contained work inside the unit using generator power, (2) work inside the unit using external facility power, and (3) using the equipment inside of a host facility. The investment costs for a base-level mobile laboratory ranged between US$5670 and US$5787 for private groups and between US$5208 and US$5315 for public groups. With the addition of a range of automated processing equipment, total investment costs ranged from US$13,616 to US$103,529 for private groups and US$12,494 to US$94,891 for public groups. The total cost per trip to cryopreserve sperm of 59 blue catfish,

Indexed as

aquatic speciescryopreservationmobile laboratoryrepository development

Identifiers

PMID36688080
PMCPMC9851160
OpenAlexW2800411014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.