Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687805›Full record

ArticleHeilberufeSCIENCE2023

[Factors of endangering and violation of autonomy in residential nursing homes: results of a scoping review].

Malte Klemmt, Tanja Henking, Andrea Teti, Silke Neuderth

Abstract readEnglish AbstractScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in HeilberufeSCIENCE, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malte KlemmtInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstraße 12, 97070 Würzburg, Deutschland.
Tanja HenkingInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstraße 12, 97070 Würzburg, Deutschland.
Andrea TetiInstitut für Gerontologie, Universität Vechta, Driverstraße 22, 49377 Vechta, Deutschland.
Silke NeuderthInstitut für Angewandte Sozialwissenschaften, Hochschule für angewandte Wissenschaften Würzburg-Schweinfurt, Münzstraße 12, 97070 Würzburg, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Respecting autonomy is one of the guiding principles of medical and nursing ethics. Nursing home residents represent a particularly relevant target group whose autonomy can be endangered or violated. Aim: The study aimed to identify factors that endanger or violate the nursing home residents' autonomy and to determine specific life situations and contexts in which these factors are located. Methods: A scoping review was carried out according to the Joanna Briggs Institute-method. Empirical results from journal articles from the publication period 2000-2021 were included. The articles were analyzed using qualitative content analysis. Results: A total of 75 articles were finally included in the review. Identified factors of the endangerment and violation of autonomy are assigned to topic areas located at the level of actors, (care) relationships and structures. Factors that can violate or endanger the residents' autonomy were found in the entire everyday life of the residents. Conclusion: The localization of the identified endangerments/violations on various actor and structural levels indicates the need for comprehensive preservation and promotion of residents' autonomy in nursing homes.

Indexed as

AutonomyNursingPaternalismResidentsSelf-determination

Identifiers

PMID36687805
PMCPMC9841482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.