Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687799›Full record

ArticleBMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies2023

Computer-assisted simulated workplace-based assessment in surgery: application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance within a mixed-reality simulation.

Philipp Stefan, Michael Pfandler, Aljoscha Kullmann, Ulrich Eck, Amelie Koch, Christoph Mehren, Anna von der Heide, Simon Weidert, Julian Fürmetz, Ekkehard Euler and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ surgery, interventions, & health technologies, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Philipp StefanChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4386-6456
Michael PfandlerInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Aljoscha KullmannChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Ulrich EckChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Amelie KochInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-2868
Christoph MehrenSpine Center, Schön Klinik München Harlaching, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9681-6028
Anna von der HeideDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Simon WeidertDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Campus Grosshadern, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Julian FürmetzDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Ekkehard EulerDepartment of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital, Campus Innenstadt, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Marc LazaroviciInstitute for Emergency Medicine and Management in Medicine (INM), University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.
Nassir NavabChair for Computer Aided Medical Procedures and Augmented Reality, Department of Informatics, Technical University of Munich, München, Germany.
Matthias WeiglInstitute and Outpatient Clinic for Occupational, Social, and Environmental Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilians University Munich, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-1725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Workplace-based assessment (WBA) is a key requirement of competency-based medical education in postgraduate surgical education. Although simulated workplace-based assessment (SWBA) has been proposed to complement WBA, it is insufficiently adopted in surgical education. In particular, approaches to criterion-referenced and automated assessment of intraoperative surgical competency in contextualized SWBA settings are missing.Main objectives were (1) application of the universal framework of intraoperative performance and exemplary adaptation to spine surgery (vertebroplasty); (2) development of computer-assisted assessment based on criterion-referenced metrics; and (3) implementation in contextualized, team-based operating room (OR) simulation, and evaluation of validity. Design: Multistage development and assessment study: (1) expert-based definition of performance indicators based on framework's performance domains; (2) development of respective assessment metrics based on preoperative planning and intraoperative performance data; (3) implementation in mixed-reality OR simulation and assessment of surgeons operating in a confederate team. Statistical analyses included internal consistency and interdomain associations, correlations with experience, and technical and non-technical performances. Setting: Surgical simulation center. Full surgical team set-up within mixed-reality OR simulation. Participants: Eleven surgeons were recruited from two teaching hospitals. Eligibility criteria included surgical specialists in orthopedic, trauma, or neurosurgery with prior VP or kyphoplasty experience. Main outcome measures: Computer-assisted assessment of surgeons' intraoperative performance. Results: Performance scores were associated with surgeons' experience, observational assessment (Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skill) scores and overall pass/fail ratings. Results provide strong evidence for validity of our computer-assisted SWBA approach. Diverse indicators of surgeons' technical and non-technical performances could be quantified and captured. Conclusions: This study is the first to investigate computer-assisted assessment based on a competency framework in authentic, contextualized team-based OR simulation. Our approach discriminates surgical competency across the domains of intraoperative performance. It advances previous automated assessment based on the use of current surgical simulators in decontextualized settings. Our findings inform future use of computer-assisted multidomain competency assessments of surgeons using SWBA approaches.

Indexed as

minimally invasive surgical proceduresoutcomes researchtechnology

Identifiers

PMID36687799
PMCPMC9853221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.