Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687754›Full record

ArticleJournal of metabolic and bariatric surgery2021

Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) is Effective in Dealing with Late Complications of OAGB: Experience from a Tertiary Bariatric Center and Literature Review.

Kelvin Voon, Chih-Kun Huang, Anand Patel, Lai-Fen Wong, Yao-Cheng Lu, Ming-Che Hsin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of metabolic and bariatric surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelvin VoonBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.
Chih-Kun HuangBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.
Anand PatelBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.
Lai-Fen WongBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.
Yao-Cheng LuBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.
Ming-Che HsinBody Science & Metabolic Disorders International Medical Center (BMIMC), China Medical University Hospital, Taichung city, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Both primary and revisional bariatric surgery are on the rise due to global obesity pandemic. This study aimed to assess the indications for revision after one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) and the outcomes after laparoscopic conversion of OAGB to roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB). Materials and Methods: Retrospective review on patients that had undergone conversion of OAGB to RYGB between June 2007-June 2019 in a tertiary bariatric center, followed by literature review. Results: Out of 386 revisional bariatric surgery, a total of 14 patients underwent laparoscopic conversion of OAGB to RYGB. The mean age was 44.7 with 71% female. The mean pre-revision BMI was 29.2 kg/m Conclusion: Bile reflux, marginal ulcer, IWL/WR and malnutrition were the main indications for revision after OAGB in this study. In concordance with the available evidence, laparoscopic conversion of OAGB to RYGB was safe and effective in dealing with late complications of OAGB.

Indexed as

Bariatric surgeryGastric bypassOutcomesRevision

Identifiers

PMID36687754
PMCPMC9847651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.