Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36687719›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Optimal cut-off value of waist circumference-to-height ratio to predict central obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic studies.

Maysa Eslami, Farzad Pourghazi, Maryam Khazdouz, Jing Tian, Kumars Pourrostami, Zahra Esmaeili-Abdar, Hanieh-Sadat Ejtahed, Mostafa Qorbani

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Physical Fitness and Health Profile of Adolescents Living in Amazonas.American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Maysa EslamiEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad PourghaziEndocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Maryam KhazdouzGrowth and Development Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Jing TianMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia.
Kumars PourrostamiSocial Determinants of Health Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Zahra Esmaeili-AbdarDietary Supplements and Probiotic Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Hanieh-Sadat EjtahedObesity and Eating Habits Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Mostafa QorbaniNon-Communicable Diseases Research Center, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRJahrom University of Medical Sciences · IRAlborz University of Medical SciencesUniversity of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Waist circumference-to-height ratio (WHtR) is a simple anthropometric index with good screening power and fast interpretation for early detection of childhood abdominal obesity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to determine the best cut-off value of WHtR to use in clinical setting. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science by the end of March 2021. Observational studies investigated the best WHtR cut-off to detect abdominal obesity in children and adolescents were included. Thirteen articles ( Results: The overall optimal cut-off was 0.49 with pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.93-0.96), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91) and 102.6 (95% CI: 50.7-207.5), respectively. The optimal WHtR cut-off to predict abdominal obesity in girls and boys were both 0.49. Discussion: The current study shows that we could use this cut-off as a simple index for predicting abdominal obesity in children and adolescents without the need for any charts in practice.

Indexed as

abdominal obesityadolescentscentral obesitychildrenwaist to height ratio

Identifiers

PMID36687719
PMCPMC9846615
OpenAlexW4313584645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.